Légaré Jean-François, MacLean Alex, Buth Karen J, Sullivan John A
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 16;173(4):371-5. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050053.
Significant controversy remains over how urgently coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) should be scheduled, particularly for patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery. Our main objective was to evaluate the safety of waiting for CABG among patients with left main coronary artery disease using a standardized triage system.
We identified 561 consecutive patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery who were scheduled to undergo CABG between Apr. 1, 1999, and Mar. 31, 2003. Using standardized triage criteria, patients were assigned to 1 of 4 waiting queues: "emergent," "in-hospital urgent," "out-of-hospital semi-urgent A" and "out-of-hospital semi-urgent B." Postoperative outcome measures were in-hospital death from any cause and a composite outcome measure of in-hospital death from any cause, a prolonged requirement for postoperative mechanical ventilation (> 24 h) and a prolonged postoperative hospital stay (> 9 d). Waiting-time variables included the specific queue, whether patients waited longer than the standard time established for each queue and whether patients were upgraded to a more urgent queue. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of the composite outcome; propensity scores (probability of being assigned to a specific queue) were entered into the model to adjust for patient variability among queues.
Of the 561 patients, 65 (11.6%) were assigned to the emergent group, 343 (61.1%) to the in-hospital urgent group, 91 (16.2%) to the semi-urgent A queue and 62 (11.1%) to the semi-urgent B queue. Four patients (0.7%) died while waiting for surgery. The median waiting times were as follows: emergent group, 0 days; in-hospital urgent group, 2 days; 30 days in the semi-urgent A group and 49 days in the semi-urgent B group. A total of 52 patients (9.3%) were upgraded to a more urgent queue, and 147 patients (26.2%) waited longer than the standard times for their respective queue. The overall in-hospital mortality was 5.5% (n = 31), and the composite outcome was 32.6% (n = 183). Independent predictors of the composite outcome were myocardial infarction within 7 days before surgery, preoperative renal failure, ejection fraction of less than 40%, age greater than 70 years and stenosis of left main coronary artery greater than 70%. Waiting-time variables were associated with neither a significantly higher mortality nor morbidity outcome.
For selected patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery, waiting for CABG did not appear to be associated with increased mortality or morbidity.
对于冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)应多紧急安排,尤其是左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者,仍存在重大争议。我们的主要目标是使用标准化分诊系统评估左主干冠状动脉疾病患者等待CABG的安全性。
我们确定了1999年4月1日至2003年3月31日期间连续安排进行CABG的561例左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者。根据标准化分诊标准,患者被分配到4个等待队列之一:“紧急”、“院内紧急”、“院外半紧急A”和“院外半紧急B”。术后结局指标包括任何原因导致的院内死亡以及任何原因导致的院内死亡、术后机械通气时间延长(>24小时)和术后住院时间延长(>9天)的综合结局指标。等待时间变量包括特定队列、患者等待时间是否超过为每个队列设定的标准时间以及患者是否升级到更紧急的队列。使用逻辑回归分析确定综合结局的独立预测因素;将倾向得分(被分配到特定队列的概率)纳入模型以调整队列间患者的变异性。
561例患者中,65例(11.6%)被分配到紧急组,343例(61.1%)被分配到院内紧急组,91例(16.2%)被分配到半紧急A队列,62例(11.1%)被分配到半紧急B队列。4例患者(0.7%)在等待手术期间死亡。中位等待时间如下:紧急组0天;院内紧急组2天;半紧急A组30天,半紧急B组49天。共有52例患者(9.3%)升级到更紧急的队列,147例患者(26.2%)等待时间超过各自队列的标准时间。总体院内死亡率为5.5%(n = 31),综合结局为32.6%(n = 183)。综合结局的独立预测因素为术前7天内心肌梗死、术前肾衰竭、射血分数低于40%、年龄大于70岁以及左主干冠状动脉狭窄大于70%。等待时间变量与死亡率或发病率升高均无显著相关性。
对于选定的左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者而言,等待CABG似乎与死亡率或发病率增加无关。