Suppr超能文献

内镜抗反流治疗:Stretta手术

Endoscopic antireflux therapy: the Stretta procedure.

作者信息

Yeh Ronald W, Triadafilopoulos George

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Alway Building M-211, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Thorac Surg Clin. 2005 Aug;15(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2005.03.006.

Abstract

The Stretta procedure is safe and effective for the treatment of GERD. There are well-documented clinical trial data supporting its use, including a randomized sham-controlled study, single- and multi-center prospective trials, and community practice reports. The complication rate is within the acceptable range for therapeutic endoscopic procedures and less than the published complication rate for laparoscopic fundoplication. The durability of effect also is established beyond 2 years in several studies. Stretta should be added to the GERD management algorithm specifically for patients considering an antireflux surgical procedure but who are not accepting of the risks of surgery and anesthesia. These patients typically present with incomplete GERD control, despite optimal antisecretory drug therapy, or intolerance to medical therapy. Stretta should be considered only for patients who fit the anatomic inclusion criteria, whereas antireflux surgery should be reserved for those who do not. The decision to undergo antireflux surgery or Stretta must be based on the relative risks and benefits of each procedure. Although antireflux surgery provides better control of esophageal acid exposure than Stretta, the outcomes for GERD symptoms, quality of life, and reduction in PPI use are comparable. Stretta has a low risk of acute adverse events, has no reported cases of long-term dysphagia, and obviates general anesthesia and hospitalization, whereas antireflux surgery has a reported adverse event rate of approximately 2%, a considerable incidence of dysphagia, and requires general anesthesia and 1 to 2 days in the hospital. Another advantage of the Stretta procedure is that antireflux surgery still can be performed in the case of failures. In conclusion, the Stretta procedure offers a minimally invasive, safe, and effective alternative to antireflux surgery for those patients who have GERD who are controlled unsatisfactorily on antisecretory medications, who are considering surgery, and who meet the anatomic criteria that make the procedure technically feasible and safe.

摘要

Stretta手术治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)安全有效。有充分的临床试验数据支持其应用,包括一项随机假手术对照研究、单中心和多中心前瞻性试验以及社区实践报告。并发症发生率在治疗性内镜手术可接受范围内,且低于已发表的腹腔镜胃底折叠术并发症发生率。多项研究还证实其疗效可持续超过2年。对于考虑抗反流手术但不接受手术和麻醉风险的GERD患者,应将Stretta手术纳入GERD管理方案。这些患者通常在接受最佳抑酸药物治疗后仍有GERD控制不佳或对药物治疗不耐受的情况。仅符合解剖学纳入标准的患者才应考虑Stretta手术,而抗反流手术应保留给不符合该标准的患者。决定进行抗反流手术还是Stretta手术必须基于每种手术的相对风险和益处。虽然抗反流手术比Stretta手术能更好地控制食管酸暴露,但在GERD症状、生活质量和减少质子泵抑制剂(PPI)使用方面的结果相当。Stretta手术急性不良事件风险低,无长期吞咽困难报告病例,无需全身麻醉和住院,而抗反流手术报告的不良事件发生率约为2%,吞咽困难发生率较高,且需要全身麻醉和住院1至2天。Stretta手术的另一个优点是失败时仍可进行抗反流手术。总之,对于那些GERD患者,若在使用抑酸药物治疗后控制不佳、考虑手术且符合使该手术在技术上可行且安全的解剖学标准,Stretta手术为抗反流手术提供了一种微创、安全且有效的替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验