Varadhachary Gauri, Ajani Jaffer A
MD Anderson Cancer Center, GI Medical Oncology Department, University of Texas, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Mailbox 426, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2005 Aug;5(4):719-25. doi: 10.1586/14737140.5.4.719.
Survival of esophageal, gastrointestinal junction and gastric cancers is poor given that they frequently present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The incidence of gastrointestinal junction adenocarcinoma is increasing whereas that of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is decreasing. The accuracy of staging has improved with newer diagnostic techniques, including positron emission tomography, endoscopic ultrasound and laparoscopy, and this should be integrated in prospective Phase III clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for some esophageal and all gastric carcinomas. For esophageal cancer (except for one trial by Walsh and colleagues), four randomized Phase III trials comparing preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone have not shown a survival benefit. Neither have the trials, where preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery, is compared with definitive chemoradiation. Nevertheless, it is commonly practiced in the USA and has become a preferred combined modality approach. Postoperative chemoradiation is favored in the USA for good performance status patients with resected, high-risk gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (more than Stage IA). The UK-MAGIC trial results, showing survival benefit with perioperative chemotherapy in operable gastric and lower esophageal cancers, probably has an impact on the treatment practice of these cancers in Europe and Asia. Promising results from trials involving preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery in gastric cancer (pathologic complete response of 20-30%) need to be further evaluated in a Phase III setting and compared with postoperative chemoradiation. Active ongoing research will help us clarify the role of preoperative and adjuvant therapies in esophageal and gastric cancers. The role of molecular profiling is evolving and will help us differentiate the responders from the nonresponders.
食管癌、胃食管交界癌和胃癌的生存率较低,因为它们常常表现为局部晚期或转移性疾病。胃食管交界腺癌的发病率正在上升,而食管鳞状细胞癌的发病率正在下降。随着包括正电子发射断层扫描、内镜超声和腹腔镜检查在内的更新诊断技术的出现,分期的准确性有所提高,这应纳入评估某些食管癌和所有胃癌新辅助和辅助治疗的前瞻性III期临床试验中。对于食管癌(除了沃尔什及其同事进行的一项试验),四项比较术前放化疗后手术与单纯手术的随机III期试验均未显示出生存获益。将术前放化疗后手术与根治性放化疗进行比较的试验也未显示出生存获益。然而,在美国这是一种常见的做法,并且已成为一种首选的联合治疗方法。在美国,对于切除的、高危胃癌或胃食管交界癌(超过IA期)且身体状况良好的患者,术后放化疗更受青睐。英国MAGIC试验结果显示,可手术的胃癌和食管下段癌围手术期化疗有生存获益,这可能会影响欧洲和亚洲对这些癌症的治疗实践。胃癌术前放化疗后手术(病理完全缓解率为20%-30%)试验的 promising 结果需要在III期环境中进一步评估,并与术后放化疗进行比较。正在进行的积极研究将有助于我们阐明术前和辅助治疗在食管癌和胃癌中的作用。分子谱分析的作用正在不断发展,将有助于我们区分反应者和无反应者。 (注:“promising”原文拼写有误,应为“Promising” )