Kimyai-Asadi Arash, Goldberg Leonard H, Jih Ming H
DermSurgery Associates, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Sep;53(3):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.02.049.
There has been no published study estimating the proportion of positive surgical margins that is missed when serial transverse cross-sectioning (bread-loafing) is used to histologically evaluate the surgical margins.
Our purpose was to estimate the accuracy of serial transverse cross-sectioning (bread-loafing) at 4-mm intervals in detecting the presence of residual tumor at the margins of well-defined facial basal cell carcinomas excised as an ellipse with 2-mm surgical margins.
Forty-two small (<1 cm), well-defined, primary, nonmorpheaform facial basal cell carcinomas that had been excised as an ellipse with 2-mm margins and that had positive surgical margins utilizing en-face Mohs sections were included. After longitudinal bisection of each ellipse, frozen sections were prepared encompassing the entire surgical margin. Transparencies with parallel lines spaced at 4-mm intervals were superimposed on the histologic slides with the lines perpendicular to the epidermal surface. Areas in which the lines intersected tumor at the surgical margin were noted. The percentage of tumors that would be detected by serial cross sections was calculated on the basis of the percentage of these parallel lines that intersected tumor.
The 42 tumors had a total of 50 positive surgical margins. Overall, the cross-sectional lines intersected tumor 44% of the time (95% confidence interval, 37%-51%). Only 5 (10%) of the residual tumors at the surgical margins exceeded 4 mm in their longitudinal dimension. In the 9 sections containing tumor in the deep margin, tumor intersected the lines 39% of the time.
Bread-loafing at 4-mm intervals of elliptical excision specimens from facial basal cell carcinomas excised with 2-mm surgical margins is only 44% sensitive in detecting residual tumor at the surgical margins. We recommend complete histologic margin control by using en face tissue orientation (Mohs technique) to identify residual tumor and reduce the risk of tumor recurrence after elliptical excision of facial basal cell carcinomas.
尚无已发表的研究评估在组织学评估手术切缘时采用连续横向切片(面包片式切片法)时遗漏的手术切缘阳性比例。
我们的目的是评估以4毫米间隔进行连续横向切片(面包片式切片法)检测以椭圆形切除且手术切缘为2毫米的明确面部基底细胞癌切缘处残留肿瘤的准确性。
纳入42例小(<1厘米)、明确、原发性、非硬斑病样面部基底细胞癌,这些肿瘤已以椭圆形切除且切缘为2毫米,采用表面莫氏切片法显示手术切缘阳性。将每个椭圆形标本纵向二等分后,制备包含整个手术切缘的冰冻切片。将间隔为4毫米的平行线透明片叠加在组织学切片上,使线垂直于表皮表面。记录线在手术切缘处与肿瘤相交的区域。根据这些平行线与肿瘤相交的百分比计算通过连续切片可检测到的肿瘤百分比。
42例肿瘤共有50个手术切缘阳性。总体而言,横断面线与肿瘤相交的时间为44%(95%置信区间,37%-51%)。手术切缘处仅5个(10%)残留肿瘤的纵向尺寸超过4毫米。在9个深部切缘含有肿瘤的切片中,肿瘤与线相交的时间为39%。
对于以2毫米手术切缘切除的面部基底细胞癌椭圆形切除标本,以4毫米间隔进行面包片式切片法在检测手术切缘残留肿瘤方面的敏感性仅为44%。我们建议通过采用表面组织定向(莫氏技术)来进行完整的组织学切缘控制,以识别残留肿瘤并降低面部基底细胞癌椭圆形切除术后肿瘤复发的风险。