Suppr超能文献

临床实践中自我血糖监测的质量控制

Quality control of SMBG in clinical practice.

作者信息

Solnica Bogdan, Naskalski Jerzy W

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2005;240:80-5. doi: 10.1080/00365510500235996.

Abstract

We present results of quality control of self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) performed in diabetes outpatient clinic. The tests included: inspection of glucose meter, blood glucose self-measurement by a patient, glucose measurement by point-of-care analyzer used in a clinic and with the laboratory method. In the study 158 glucose meters were controlled and compared with HemoCue glucose analyzer used in the clinic as the reference. 122 glucose meters readings were also compared with the reference laboratory method. Tested glucose meters included: Accutrend {18}, Glucotrend {59}, Precision QiD {39}, One Touch {26} and Glucocard II {16}. Reference glucose assays were performed using glucose oxidase method on Hitachi 911 analyzer. Glucose concentrations measured by the controlled glucose meters ranged from 36 to 425 mg/dL. The analytical bias of the glucose meters amounted from 2.48% to 8.27%. Correlation coefficient between results obtained by the tested glucose meters and HemoCue analyzer ranged from 0.957 to 0.980 and between glucose meters and laboratory method from 0.955 to 0.985. Passing-Bablok agreement test and Deming regression analysis indicated good concordance of results between all the tested glucose meters and HemoCue analyzer, whereas good agreement with the laboratory method was found for Accutrend, Glucotrend, Precision QiD and One Touch glucose meters. In conclusion, good analytical performance of the employed glucose meters and a bias less than 10% from the reference values were found. Results of this study show the possibility for routine, convenient for the patient quality control of SMBG in an outpatient clinic.

摘要

我们展示了在糖尿病门诊进行的自我监测血糖(SMBG)质量控制的结果。测试包括:血糖仪检查、患者自我血糖测量、诊所使用的即时检验分析仪测量血糖以及实验室方法测量血糖。在该研究中,对158台血糖仪进行了控制,并与诊所使用的HemoCue血糖仪作为参考进行比较。还将122台血糖仪的读数与参考实验室方法进行了比较。测试的血糖仪包括:Accutrend {18}、Glucotrend {59}、Precision QiD {39}、One Touch {26}和Glucocard II {16}。使用葡萄糖氧化酶法在日立911分析仪上进行参考葡萄糖测定。经控制的血糖仪测量的葡萄糖浓度范围为36至425mg/dL。血糖仪的分析偏差为2.48%至8.27%。测试血糖仪与HemoCue分析仪获得的结果之间的相关系数范围为0.957至0.980,血糖仪与实验室方法之间的相关系数范围为0.955至0.985。Passing-Bablok一致性检验和Deming回归分析表明,所有测试血糖仪与HemoCue分析仪之间的结果具有良好的一致性,而Accutrend、Glucotrend、Precision QiD和One Touch血糖仪与实验室方法具有良好的一致性。总之,所使用的血糖仪具有良好的分析性能,与参考值的偏差小于10%。本研究结果表明,在门诊对SMBG进行常规、方便患者的质量控制是可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验