Suppr超能文献

女性急性阑尾炎诊断评分分析

Analysis of scores in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women.

作者信息

Horzić Matija, Salamon Antun, Kopljar Mario, Skupnjak Maja, Cupurdija Kristijan, Vanjak Dana

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Surgery I, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Coll Antropol. 2005 Jun;29(1):133-8.

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical condition that requires prompt diagnosis. Besides modern imaging techniques, scoring systems, based on clinical signs and symptoms and routine laboratory assessments, have been used as a diagnostic aid. However, differences in sensitivities and specificities were observed if the scores were applied to various populations and clinical settings. The purpose of this paper is to assess validity of three scores (modified Alvarado score, Ohmann score and Eskelinen score) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women. 126 female patients admitted for suspicion of acute appendicitis in a tertiary hospital emergency department were analyzed prospectively. Modified Alvarado score, Ohmann score and Eskelinen score were calculated at admission and compared to final diagnosis. All patients with modified Alvarado score 7 or more had acute appendicitis (100% specificity) and it can be used to determine the need for immediate appendectomy. Values of Ohmann score greater than 6 resulted in 0.9% rate of overlooked appendicitis. Besides obvious educational role, scores may help to determine the group of patients who require immediate appendectomy, therefore expediting treatment and avoid unnecessary observation or more lengthy diagnostic procedures that require highly educated and skilled senior staff: No single score may be used alone to dictate or decline surgery. Different cut-off points may also be considered for different subpopulations.

摘要

急性阑尾炎是一种常见的外科疾病,需要及时诊断。除了现代成像技术外,基于临床体征、症状和常规实验室评估的评分系统也已被用作诊断辅助手段。然而,将这些评分应用于不同人群和临床环境时,观察到敏感性和特异性存在差异。本文的目的是评估三种评分(改良阿尔瓦拉多评分、奥曼评分和埃斯凯林评分)对女性急性阑尾炎诊断的有效性。对一家三级医院急诊科收治的126例疑似急性阑尾炎的女性患者进行了前瞻性分析。入院时计算改良阿尔瓦拉多评分、奥曼评分和埃斯凯林评分,并与最终诊断结果进行比较。所有改良阿尔瓦拉多评分7分及以上的患者均患有急性阑尾炎(特异性为100%),可用于确定是否需要立即进行阑尾切除术。奥曼评分大于6分的患者漏诊阑尾炎的发生率为0.9%。除了具有明显的指导作用外,评分还可能有助于确定需要立即进行阑尾切除术的患者群体,从而加快治疗速度,避免不必要的观察或需要高学历和熟练资深工作人员的更冗长的诊断程序:没有单一的评分可以单独用于决定是否进行手术。对于不同的亚人群,也可以考虑不同的截断点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验