Suppr超能文献

改良阿瓦拉多评分、埃斯凯林评分及奥曼评分在诊断急性阑尾炎中的准确性

Accuracy of Modified Alvarado Score, Eskelinen Score and Ohmann Score in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis.

作者信息

Rastović Pejana, Trninić Zoran, Galić Gordan, Brekalo Zdrinko, Lesko Josip, Pavlović Marko

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Bijeli Brijeg bb, 88000 Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina,

出版信息

Psychiatr Danub. 2017 May;29(Suppl 2):134-141.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

By processing the data of a large number of patients with abdominal pain, diagnostic scores whose implementation attempts to facilitate acute appendicitis diagnostics were developed. Modified Alvarado score, Ohmann score and Eskelinen score are used as assistance when setting the diagnosis and making a decision to undertake surgery.

AIM

To assess accuracy of Alvarado score, Ohmann score and Eskelinen score in diagnosing acute appendicitis and to establish connection of total score of these scoring systems with histopathological degree of appendicitis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Surgery of University Clinical Hospital Mostar. The study included 70 patients who underwent appendectomy and were scored before surgery. All tested persons were examined by experienced surgeon who took anamnesis, physical status and ordered laboratory diagnostic tests. Appendicitis was excluded or confirmed by means of histopathological diagnostics, and the degree of appendicitis was determined.

RESULTS

According to accuracy parameters (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value), the score which was of highest value was Ohmann score, followed by Eskelinen score, while the lowest value was the one of modified Alvarado score. Total score in all three scoring systems follows the degree of appendicitis, but statistical significance was proven only for Ohmann and Eskelinen scores.

CONCLUSION

Ohmann and Eskelinen scores can be useful in diagnosing acute appendicitis, predicting the degree of appendicitis, as well as assistance when making decision to undertake an operative procedure. Modified Alvarado score in our subjects did not prove sufficient value. Diagnostics of acute appendicitis still must be led by contemporary algorithms in which diagnostic scoring is implemented.

摘要

引言

通过处理大量腹痛患者的数据,开发了旨在促进急性阑尾炎诊断的诊断评分系统。改良的阿尔瓦拉多评分、奥曼评分和埃斯凯林评分在诊断和决定是否进行手术时用作辅助工具。

目的

评估阿尔瓦拉多评分、奥曼评分和埃斯凯林评分在诊断急性阑尾炎中的准确性,并确定这些评分系统的总分与阑尾炎组织病理学程度之间的关系。

对象与方法

在莫斯塔尔大学临床医院外科进行了一项横断面研究。该研究纳入了70例行阑尾切除术且术前进行了评分的患者。所有受试人员均由经验丰富的外科医生进行检查,医生采集了病史、身体状况并安排了实验室诊断检查。通过组织病理学诊断排除或确诊阑尾炎,并确定阑尾炎的程度。

结果

根据准确性参数(敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值),价值最高的评分是奥曼评分,其次是埃斯凯林评分,而价值最低的是改良阿尔瓦拉多评分。所有三个评分系统的总分均与阑尾炎程度相关,但仅奥曼评分和埃斯凯林评分具有统计学意义。

结论

奥曼评分和埃斯凯林评分在诊断急性阑尾炎、预测阑尾炎程度以及辅助决定是否进行手术方面可能有用。在我们的研究对象中,改良阿尔瓦拉多评分未证明有足够价值。急性阑尾炎的诊断仍必须遵循实施诊断评分的当代算法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验