Michael J W-P, König D P, Imhoff A B, Martinek V, Braun S, Hübscher M, Koch C, Dreithaler B, Bernholt J, Preis S, Loew M, Rickert M, Speck M, Bös L, Bidner A, Eysel P
Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Köln.
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005 Jul-Aug;143(4):438-45. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836806.
The main objective of this study was to prove that a postoperative combined continuous passive motion (CPM) and physiotherapy treatment protocol (CPM group) can achieve 90 degrees active abduction in the shoulder joint earlier than physiotherapy alone (PT group). The indication was a complete tear of the rotator cuff.
The study was conducted under in-patient and out-patient conditions. 55 patients were included in this study. The prospective, randomized multicenter study design complies with DIN EN 540. The primary endpoint was the time span until 90 degrees active abduction was achieved by the patients.
Patients in the CPM group reached the primary endpoint on average 12 days earlier than the control group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0292). Analyzing the secondary endpoints, e. g., pain and disablement, the results in the CPM group showed again advantages of the combined treatment protocol (CPM + physiotherapy).
The postoperative treatment of a total tear of the rotator cuff with a combined continuous passive motion and physiotherapy protocol provided a significantly earlier range of motion in the shoulder joint than physiotherapy alone. There was no report of CPM-related adverse effects.
本研究的主要目的是证明术后联合持续被动运动(CPM)和物理治疗方案(CPM组)比单纯物理治疗(PT组)能更早使肩关节实现主动外展90度。纳入标准为肩袖完全撕裂。
本研究在住院和门诊条件下进行。本研究共纳入55例患者。前瞻性、随机多中心研究设计符合DIN EN 540标准。主要终点是患者达到主动外展90度的时间跨度。
CPM组患者达到主要终点的时间平均比对照组早12天。这一差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.0292)。分析次要终点,如疼痛和功能障碍,CPM组的结果再次显示联合治疗方案(CPM + 物理治疗)的优势。
肩袖完全撕裂术后采用持续被动运动和物理治疗联合方案,比单纯物理治疗能显著更早地恢复肩关节活动范围。未报告与CPM相关的不良反应。