Ferguson Sue A, Marras William S, Burr Deborah L
Biodynamics Laboratory, Institute for Ergonomics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Sep;15(3):329-41. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-5940-4.
The rate of recurrence in low back pain patients has been reported as high as 70%; therefore, it is believed that researchers have a poor understanding of low back pain recovery. To enhance our understanding of recovery, a large cross-sectional study was conducted to compare outcome measures of return to work, impairment of activities of daily living, pain symptoms, and functional performance probability. A total of 208 workers were examined. The percentage of workers recovered based on return to work criteria was 99% compared to 25% for impairment of activities of daily living, 17% for symptoms, and 12.5% for functional performance probability. Single functional performance measures of range of motion, velocity, and acceleration had recovery rates of 59, 13, and 10%, respectively. It appears that all these criteria are measuring very different parameters of low back pain recovery. The residual loss in functional performance may indicate a decreased tolerance to physical demand providing potential insight for why recurrent low back pain rates are high.
据报道,腰痛患者的复发率高达70%;因此,人们认为研究人员对腰痛恢复的了解不足。为了增进我们对恢复情况的了解,开展了一项大型横断面研究,以比较重返工作岗位、日常生活活动受限、疼痛症状和功能表现概率等结果指标。总共对208名工人进行了检查。根据重返工作岗位标准,恢复的工人比例为99%,而日常生活活动受限的比例为25%,症状方面为17%,功能表现概率方面为12.5%。运动范围、速度和加速度等单一功能表现指标的恢复率分别为59%、13%和10%。看来所有这些标准衡量的是腰痛恢复的非常不同的参数。功能表现方面的残余损失可能表明对身体需求的耐受性降低,这为复发性腰痛率高的原因提供了潜在的见解。