• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护中患者口腔护理的频率与体位:一项重复研究。

Frequency of oral care and positioning of patients in critical care: a replication study.

作者信息

Hanneman Sandra K, Gusick Gary Michael

机构信息

Center for Nursing Research, University of Texas School of Nursing at Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2005 Sep;14(5):378-86; quiz 387.

PMID:16120889
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral care and head-of-bed elevation are interventions to decrease risk of aspiration pneumonia in hospitalized patients. In a previous study, nurses' self-reports of how often they performed oral care did not match documented provision of such care.

OBJECTIVES

To replicate the original study and estimate instrument reliability.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design was used, and survey data from nursing personnel and bedside observational data from 9 intensive care units were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 181 surveys (47%) were returned, and data were collected from 436 bedsides. Reported frequencies of oral care and use of oral care products differed between nonintubated and intubated patients (P< .001). The mean documented frequency of oral care for nonintubated patients was 1.8 (SD 1.5); self-reported frequency was 3 (SD 2.4). The mean documented frequency of oral care for intubated patients was 3.3 (SD 1.8); self-reported frequency was 4.2 (SD 2.1). Documented oral care frequency differed by unit (P = .006) and intubation status (P < .001). Mean observed head-of-bed position was 38 degrees (SD 24 degrees ) for nonintubated patients and 23 degrees (SD 12 degrees ) for intubated patients (P < .001). Intubation status, but not unit, affected observed head-of-bed position (P < .001). Three survey items had adequate reliability evidence (r = 0.70). Interrater reliability for bedside data collection was 96% or greater.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite inadequate estimates of survey reliability, findings generally were comparable to results of the original study; nurses report more frequent oral care than is documented. Intensive care nurses elevate the head of patients' beds in accordance with self-reports.

摘要

背景

口腔护理和床头抬高是降低住院患者误吸性肺炎风险的干预措施。在先前的一项研究中,护士自我报告的口腔护理执行频率与记录的此类护理提供情况不相符。

目的

重复原研究并评估工具的可靠性。

方法

采用横断面设计,收集了护理人员的调查数据和9个重症监护病房的床边观察数据。

结果

共收回181份调查问卷(47%),并从436个床边收集了数据。非插管患者和插管患者报告的口腔护理频率及口腔护理产品使用情况存在差异(P<0.001)。非插管患者记录的口腔护理平均频率为1.8次(标准差1.5);自我报告频率为3次(标准差2.4)。插管患者记录的口腔护理平均频率为3.3次(标准差1.8);自我报告频率为4.2次(标准差2.1)。记录的口腔护理频率因科室而异(P = 0.006),也因插管状态而异(P < 0.001)。非插管患者床头平均观察位置为38度(标准差24度),插管患者为23度(标准差12度)(P < 0.001)。插管状态而非科室影响观察到的床头位置(P < 0.001)。三个调查项目有足够的可靠性证据(r = 0.70)。床边数据收集的评分者间信度为96%或更高。

结论

尽管对调查可靠性的估计不足,但研究结果总体上与原研究结果相当;护士报告的口腔护理频率高于记录的频率。重症监护护士根据自我报告抬高患者床头。

相似文献

1
Frequency of oral care and positioning of patients in critical care: a replication study.重症监护中患者口腔护理的频率与体位:一项重复研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2005 Sep;14(5):378-86; quiz 387.
2
Oral care interventions in critical care: frequency and documentation.重症监护中的口腔护理干预措施:频率与记录
Am J Crit Care. 2003 Mar;12(2):113-8; discussion 119.
3
Validity and reliability of an oral care practice survey for the orally intubated adult critically ill patient.针对成年口腔插管重症患者的口腔护理实践调查的效度和信度。
Nurs Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;58(5):374-7. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181b4b3d1.
4
Oral care practices for orally intubated critically ill adults.口腔护理实践:对经口气管插管的危重症成人
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Mar;19(2):175-83. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010816.
5
Oral care practices among critical care nurses in Singapore: a questionnaire survey.新加坡重症监护护士的口腔护理实践:问卷调查。
Appl Nurs Res. 2012 Aug;25(3):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
6
Critical care nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices of oral care for patients with oral endotracheal intubation: a questionnaire survey.重症监护病房护士对经口气管插管患者口腔护理的知识、态度和实践:问卷调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Nov;20(21-22):3204-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03819.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
7
Nurses' implementation of guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.护士对美国疾病控制与预防中心发布的呼吸机相关性肺炎指南的执行情况。
Am J Crit Care. 2007 Jan;16(1):28-36; discussion 37; quiz 38.
8
Effect of standardized orders and provider education on head-of-bed positioning in mechanically ventilated patients.标准化医嘱和医护人员教育对机械通气患者床头抬高体位的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Sep;31(9):2285-90. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000079609.81180.15.
9
Oral health, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and intracranial pressure in intubated patients in a neuroscience intensive care unit.神经科学重症监护病房中插管患者的口腔健康、呼吸机相关性肺炎和颅内压
Am J Crit Care. 2009 Jul;18(4):368-76. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009621.
10
Use of backrest elevation in critical care: a pilot study.重症监护中靠背抬高的应用:一项试点研究。
Am J Crit Care. 1999 Jan;8(1):475-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral Care in Trauma Patients Admitted to the ICU: Viewpoints of ICU Nurses.入住重症监护病房的创伤患者的口腔护理:重症监护病房护士的观点。
Trauma Mon. 2014 Apr;19(2):e15110. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.15110. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
2
Intensive care nurses' opinions and practice for oral care of mechanically ventilated patients.重症监护护士对机械通气患者口腔护理的看法与实践
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;17(1):23-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.112154.
3
Backrest position in prevention of pressure ulcers and ventilator-associated pneumonia: conflicting recommendations.
靠背姿势在预防压疮和呼吸机相关性肺炎中的应用:相互矛盾的建议。
Heart Lung. 2012 Nov-Dec;41(6):536-45. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
4
Not-so-trivial pursuit: mechanical ventilation risk reduction.并非微不足道的追求:降低机械通气风险
Am J Crit Care. 2009 Jul;18(4):299-309. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009724.
5
Oral care practices in intensive care units: a survey of 59 European ICUs.重症监护病房的口腔护理实践:对59个欧洲重症监护病房的调查。
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):1066-70. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0605-3. Epub 2007 Mar 24.