Mackinnon S E
Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Hand Clin. 1992 May;8(2):369-90.
The double crush hypothesis suggests that serial constraints to axoplasmic flow, each of which is insufficient to cause changes in function by itself, can be additive in causing ultimate dysfunction of the nerve. Careful clinical examination will be required to localize the significant levels of nerve compression. Frequently, patients will be asymptomatic in the nonprovoked position. A comparison of neurological testing "at rest" and then subsequent to provocation of the patient's symptoms may be the only mechanism by which the surgeon will be able to quantity an abnormality that corresponds to the patient's symptoms. Surgical intervention, especially when the etiologic factor is work-related, is always postponed until maximum job modification has been carried out. Surgical management of these patients without a significant change in the patient's work habits that provoked the compression neuropathies in the first instance will frequently be associated with a recurrence of symptoms when the work is resumed.
双重压迫假说认为,对轴浆流的一系列限制,其中每一种本身都不足以导致功能改变,但它们可能会累加起来导致神经最终功能障碍。需要进行仔细的临床检查以确定神经受压的显著部位。通常,患者在非激发状态下无症状。比较“静息时”和激发患者症状后的神经学检查,可能是外科医生能够量化与患者症状相对应的异常情况的唯一方法。手术干预,尤其是当病因与工作相关时,总是推迟到最大限度地改变工作方式之后进行。如果在最初引发压迫性神经病变的患者工作习惯没有显著改变的情况下对这些患者进行手术治疗,那么当恢复工作时,症状经常会复发。