Gustafsson Ove, Saksvik Per Øystein
Trondheim Business School, HiST, N-7004 Trondheim, Norway.
Work. 2005;25(2):91-7.
An outsourcing process in a medium-size city, by Norwegian standards, provided the background for our study. In 1996, the city council decided to contract out the refuse collection in half of its total area (the western part of the city), and to let the public refuse collection enterprise continue to collect in the other half of the area. The public enterprise also participated in the competitive tender, without success, however. The bid submitted by the public refuse collection enterprise was used as the basis for a benchmarking process performed by the chief administrative officer of the city in May 1999. The process resulted in the requirement that the public enterprise downsize its number of refuse collectors by 27 per cent. The city thus acquired a more cost-effective refuse collection system both in the western part, now run by a private company, and in the rest of the city, where the collection remained the responsibility of the public enterprise, in its newly pared-down and reorganized version. Detectable changes in the refuse collectors' health status in the three-year period immediately following the outsourcing constitute our main focus in this study. We found that the downsizing and reorganization of the public enterprise had a negative impact on the refuse collectors' health status. One year after the downsizing, six of the 27 refuse collectors remaining in the public enterprise had been diagnosed with heart problems or musculoskeletal pains that were sufficiently serious to form the basis of their individual approaches to secure a disability pension, which all six were in the process of acquiring. The registered sick leave among the refuse collectors showed a dramatic increase during the same period. We found clear indications that the refuse collectors remaining in the employment of the public enterprise had no alternatives in the labour market. Although not the focus of this study, we found that the totality of costs and benefits, not only for the enterprise in question, but also for local and national authorities, needs to be considered in any realistic assessment of the impact of public sector outsourcing of activities.
按照挪威的标准,一个中等规模城市的外包过程为我们的研究提供了背景。1996年,市议会决定将全市一半区域(城市西部)的垃圾收集工作外包出去,另一半区域则让公共垃圾收集企业继续负责收集。公共企业也参与了竞争性招标,但未成功。1999年5月,该市首席行政官以公共垃圾收集企业提交的标书为基础进行了标杆管理。这一过程导致要求公共企业将垃圾收集人员数量减少27%。这样一来,该市在西部(现由一家私人公司运营)以及城市其他地区(公共企业在精简重组后仍负责收集)都获得了更具成本效益的垃圾收集系统。我们研究的主要关注点是外包后紧接着的三年里垃圾收集人员健康状况的可察觉变化。我们发现公共企业的精简重组对垃圾收集人员的健康状况产生了负面影响。精简一年后,公共企业剩余的27名垃圾收集人员中有6人被诊断出患有心脏问题或肌肉骨骼疼痛,严重程度足以作为他们申请残疾抚恤金的依据,这6人都在申请过程中。同一时期,垃圾收集人员的病假记录大幅增加。我们发现有明确迹象表明,仍受雇于公共企业的垃圾收集人员在劳动力市场上没有其他选择。虽然这不是本研究的重点,但我们发现,在对公共部门活动外包的影响进行任何现实评估时,不仅要考虑相关企业,还要考虑地方和国家当局的成本和收益总和。