Penna Claudia, Cappello Sandra, Mancardi Daniele, Raimondo Stefania, Rastaldo Raffaella, Gattullo Donatella, Losano Gianni, Pagliaro Pasquale
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche dell'Università di Torino, Orbassano, TO, Italy.
Basic Res Cardiol. 2006 Mar;101(2):168-79. doi: 10.1007/s00395-005-0543-6. Epub 2005 Aug 19.
We aimed to assess the role of the nitric oxide (NO)-cGMP pathway in cardioprotection by brief intermittent ischemias at the onset of reperfusion (i.e., post-conditioning (Post-con)). We also evaluated the role of coronary flow and pressure in Post-con. Rat isolated hearts perfused at constant- flow or -pressure underwent 30 min global ischemia and 120 min reperfusion. Post-con obtained with brief ischemias of different duration (modified, MPost-con) was compared with Post-con obtained with ischemias of identical duration (classical, C-Post-con) and with ischemic preconditioning (IP). Infarct size was evaluated using nitro-blue tetrazolium staining and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. In the groups, NO synthase (NOS) or guanylyl-cyclase (GC) was inhibited with LNAME and ODQ, respectively. In the subgroups, the enzyme immunoassay technique was used to quantify cGMP release. In the constant-flow model, M-Post-con and C-Post-con were equally effective, but more effective than IP in reducing infarct size. The cardioprotection by M-Post-con was only blunted by the NOS-inhibitor, but was abolished by the GC-antagonist. Post-ischemic cGMP release was enhanced by MPost-con. In the constant-pressure model IP, M-Post-con and C-Post-con were equally effective in reducing infarct size. Post-con protocols were more effective in the constant-flow than in the constant-pressure model. In all groups, LDH release during reperfusion was proportional to infarct size. In conclusion, Post-con depends upon GC activation, which can be achieved by NOS-dependent and NOS-independent pathways. The benefits of M- and CPost-con are similar. However, protection by Post-con is greater in the constant-flow than in the constant-pressure model.
我们旨在评估一氧化氮(NO)-环磷酸鸟苷(cGMP)通路在再灌注开始时短暂间歇性缺血(即后适应(Post-con))对心脏保护作用中的作用。我们还评估了冠脉血流和压力在Post-con中的作用。以恒流或恒压灌注的大鼠离体心脏经历30分钟全心缺血和120分钟再灌注。将不同持续时间短暂缺血获得的后适应(改良型,MPost-con)与相同持续时间缺血获得的后适应(经典型,C-Post-con)以及缺血预处理(IP)进行比较。使用硝基蓝四氮唑染色和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)释放来评估梗死面积。在这些组中,分别用左旋硝基精氨酸甲酯(LNAME)和1H-[1,2,4]恶二唑[4,3-a]喹喔啉-1-one(ODQ)抑制一氧化氮合酶(NOS)或鸟苷酸环化酶(GC)。在亚组中,采用酶免疫测定技术定量cGMP释放。在恒流模型中,MPost-con和C-Post-con在减小梗死面积方面同样有效,但比IP更有效。MPost-con的心脏保护作用仅被NOS抑制剂减弱,但被GC拮抗剂消除。MPost-con增强了缺血后cGMP的释放。在恒压模型IP中,MPost-con和C-Post-con在减小梗死面积方面同样有效。后适应方案在恒流模型中比在恒压模型中更有效。在所有组中,再灌注期间LDH的释放与梗死面积成正比。总之,Post-con依赖于GC激活,这可通过依赖NOS和不依赖NOS的途径实现。MPost-con和C-Post-con的益处相似。然而,Post-con在恒流模型中的保护作用比在恒压模型中更大。