• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化急性生理学评分系统3——从患者评估到重症监护病房评估。第1部分:目标、方法和队列描述。

SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description.

作者信息

Metnitz Philipp G H, Moreno Rui P, Almeida Eduardo, Jordan Barbara, Bauer Peter, Campos Ricardo Abizanda, Iapichino Gaetano, Edbrooke David, Capuzzo Maurizia, Le Gall Jean-Roger

机构信息

Dept. of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1336-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6. Epub 2005 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6
PMID:16132893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1315314/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Risk adjustment systems now in use were developed more than a decade ago and lack prognostic performance. Objective of the SAPS 3 study was to collect data about risk factors and outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, in order to develop a new, improved model for risk adjustment.

DESIGN

Prospective multicentre, multinational cohort study.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

A total of 19,577 patients consecutively admitted to 307 ICUs from 14 October to 15 December 2002.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Data were collected at ICU admission, on days 1, 2 and 3, and the last day of the ICU stay. Data included sociodemographics, chronic conditions, diagnostic information, physiological derangement at ICU admission, number and severity of organ dysfunctions, length of ICU and hospital stay, and vital status at ICU and hospital discharge. Data reliability was tested with use of kappa statistics and intraclass-correlation coefficients, which were >0.85 for the majority of variables. Completeness of the data was also satisfactory, with 1 [0-3] SAPS II parameter missing per patient. Prognostic performance of the SAPS II was poor, with significant differences between observed and expected mortality rates for the overall cohort and four (of seven) defined regions, and poor calibration for most tested subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAPS 3 study was able to provide a high-quality multinational database, reflecting heterogeneity of current ICU case-mix and typology. The poor performance of SAPS II in this cohort underscores the need for development of a new risk adjustment system for critically ill patients.

摘要

目的

目前使用的风险调整系统是十多年前开发的,缺乏预后评估性能。SAPS 3研究的目的是收集重症监护病房(ICU)患者异质性队列中的风险因素和预后数据,以便开发一种新的、改进的风险调整模型。

设计

前瞻性多中心、跨国队列研究。

患者和研究地点

2002年10月14日至12月15日期间,共有19577例患者连续入住307个ICU。

测量和结果

在ICU入院时、第1、2、3天以及ICU住院的最后一天收集数据。数据包括社会人口统计学、慢性病、诊断信息、ICU入院时的生理紊乱、器官功能障碍的数量和严重程度、ICU和住院时间以及ICU和医院出院时的生命状态。使用kappa统计和组内相关系数对数据可靠性进行测试,大多数变量的系数>0.85。数据完整性也令人满意,每位患者缺失1[0-3]个SAPS II参数。SAPS II的预后评估性能较差,总体队列和七个定义区域中的四个区域的观察死亡率和预期死亡率之间存在显著差异,并且大多数测试亚组的校准效果不佳。

结论

SAPS 3研究能够提供一个高质量的跨国数据库,反映当前ICU病例组合和类型的异质性。SAPS II在该队列中的表现不佳凸显了为重症患者开发新的风险调整系统的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbc/1315314/30c2ad5bb314/s00134-005-2762-6fmb1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbc/1315314/30c2ad5bb314/s00134-005-2762-6fmb1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbc/1315314/30c2ad5bb314/s00134-005-2762-6fmb1.jpg

相似文献

1
SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description.简化急性生理学评分系统3——从患者评估到重症监护病房评估。第1部分:目标、方法和队列描述。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1336-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
2
Outcome prediction in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre, Portuguese study.重症监护中的预后预测:一项前瞻性、多中心的葡萄牙研究结果。
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Feb;23(2):177-86. doi: 10.1007/s001340050313.
3
SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission.简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)——从患者评估到重症监护病房评估。第2部分:重症监护病房入院时医院死亡率预后模型的开发。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1345-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
4
A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group.重症监护病房患者疾病严重程度评分系统的比较:一项多中心、跨国研究的结果。欧洲/北美严重程度研究组。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;23(8):1327-35. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199508000-00005.
5
Is the SAPS II score valid in surgical intensive care unit patients?SAPS II 评分在外科重症监护病房患者中是否有效?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):231-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01559.x. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
6
Performance of SAPS II according to ICU length of stay: A Danish nationwide cohort study.SAPS II 评分在 ICU 住院时间中的表现:一项丹麦全国队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1200-1209. doi: 10.1111/aas.13415. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
7
Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database.在一个独立数据库上对两种结果预测模型进行评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):50-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00016.
8
Validation of severity scoring systems SAPS II and APACHE II in a single-center population.单中心人群中SAPS II和APACHE II严重程度评分系统的验证
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1779-85. doi: 10.1007/s001340000715.
9
Accuracy of a composite score using daily SAPS II and LOD scores for predicting hospital mortality in ICU patients hospitalized for more than 72 h.使用每日序贯器官衰竭评估(SAPS)II 评分和住院死亡概率(LOD)评分的综合评分预测入住重症监护病房(ICU)超过72小时患者医院死亡率的准确性。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jun;27(6):1012-21. doi: 10.1007/s001340100961.
10
Validation of APACHE II and SAPS II scales at the intensive care unit along with assessment of SOFA scale at the admission as an isolated risk of death predictor.在重症监护病房对急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)进行验证,并在入院时评估序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)量表作为独立的死亡风险预测指标。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2019;51(2):107-111. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.86275.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-time prediction of intensive care unit patient acuity and therapy requirements using state-space modelling.使用状态空间模型对重症监护病房患者的病情严重程度和治疗需求进行实时预测。
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 8;16(1):7315. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62121-1.
2
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill elderly patients aged 90 years and older.90岁及以上老年危重症患者的临床特征与结局
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05343-z.
3
The Influence of Opioids on Pupil Initial Diameter and Pupillary Dilation Velocity in ICU Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Post-ICU mortality in critically ill infected patients: an international study.重症感染患者的重症监护病房后死亡率:一项国际研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jan;31(1):56-63. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2484-1. Epub 2004 Nov 4.
2
Winter excess mortality in intensive care in the UK: an analysis of outcome adjusted for patient case mix and unit workload.英国重症监护中的冬季超额死亡率:对根据患者病例组合和单位工作量调整后的结果进行的分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Oct;30(10):1900-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2390-6. Epub 2004 Aug 6.
3
More interventions do not necessarily improve outcome in critically ill patients.
阿片类药物对ICU患者瞳孔初始直径和瞳孔扩张速度的影响。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jul;69(6):e70080. doi: 10.1111/aas.70080.
4
Health-related quality of life and functional recovery after intensive care for sepsis in a national cohort.全国队列中脓毒症重症监护后的健康相关生活质量和功能恢复
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07998-8.
5
Ventilator-associated events criteria in the assessment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (IMPACTO MR-PAV): A prospective cohort.评估呼吸机相关性肺炎的呼吸机相关事件标准(IMPACTO MR-PAV):一项前瞻性队列研究。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2025 May 21;29(4):104543. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2025.104543.
6
Corticosteroids and long-term pulmonary function after critical illness due to COVID-19- a single-center cohort study.皮质类固醇与新型冠状病毒肺炎危重症后的长期肺功能——一项单中心队列研究
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03659-0.
7
Development and Validation of a Dynamic Real-Time Risk Prediction Model for Intensive Care Units Patients Based on Longitudinal Irregular Data: Multicenter Retrospective Study.基于纵向不规则数据的重症监护病房患者动态实时风险预测模型的开发与验证:多中心回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e69293. doi: 10.2196/69293.
8
Discordance between physical and cognitive health problems over one year after critical care: Insights from severe COVID-19 patients.重症监护一年后身体与认知健康问题之间的不一致:来自重症 COVID-19 患者的见解
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Jun;29(6):100547. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100547. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
9
Impact of mechanical ventilation on severe acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with and without COVID-19 - a multicentre propensity matched analysis.机械通气对合并及未合并新型冠状病毒肺炎的危重症患者严重急性肾损伤的影响——一项多中心倾向匹配分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01424-4.
10
Exploring the impact of age on the predictive power of the National Early Warning score (NEWS) 2, and long-term prognosis among patients reviewed by a Rapid Response Team: A prospective, multi-centre study.探讨年龄对国家早期预警评分(NEWS)2预测能力的影响,以及快速反应团队评估的患者的长期预后:一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Dec 10;21:100839. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100839. eCollection 2025 Jan.
更多的干预措施不一定能改善重症患者的预后。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug;30(8):1586-93. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2154-8. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
4
If most intensive care units are graduating with honors, is it genuine quality or grade inflation?如果大多数重症监护病房都以优异成绩结业,这是真正的质量还是成绩膨胀?
Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):2145-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00034.
5
Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort study.一项国际多中心队列研究中ICU患者脓毒症和感染的流行病学
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Feb;28(2):108-21. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1143-z. Epub 2001 Dec 4.
6
Mortality after discharge from intensive care: the impact of organ system failure and nursing workload use at discharge.重症监护病房出院后的死亡率:器官系统衰竭及出院时护理工作量的影响
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jun;27(6):999-1004. doi: 10.1007/s001340100966.
7
Interobserver variability in data collection of the APACHE II score in teaching and community hospitals.教学医院和社区医院中急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)数据收集的观察者间变异性。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1999-2004. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00046.
8
Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire.西欧重症监护病房中放弃生命支持:一份伦理调查问卷的结果
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1626-33. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00042.
9
Prognostic performance and customization of the SAPS II: results of a multicenter Austrian study. Simplified Acute Physiology Score.SAPS II的预后性能及定制:奥地利一项多中心研究的结果。简化急性生理学评分
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Feb;25(2):192-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340050815.
10
Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分来评估重症监护病房中器官功能障碍/衰竭的发生率:一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果。欧洲重症监护医学学会“脓毒症相关问题”工作组
Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016.