Suppr超能文献

西欧重症监护病房中放弃生命支持:一份伦理调查问卷的结果

Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire.

作者信息

Vincent J L

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1626-33. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00042.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine current views of European intensive care physicians regarding end-of-life decisions.

DESIGN

A questionnaire was sent to all physician members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. All questionnaires were anonymous.

RESULTS

A total of 504 completed questionnaires from 16 western European countries were analyzed. Eighty-seven percent of the respondents were male. Forty-six percent of respondents said that intensive care unit admissions were generally or commonly affected by bed shortages, particularly in the south. Nevertheless, 73% of units frequently admit patients with no hope of survival, although only 33% of respondents felt that such patients should be admitted. Eighty percent of respondents felt that written do-not-resuscitate orders should be applied, but only 58% did so, with a wide variation according to country (from 8% in Italy to 91% in The Netherlands). Ninety-three percent of physicians sometimes withhold treatment from patients with no hope of a meaningful life, but withdrawal of treatment is less common. Forty percent of respondents said that they would deliberately administer large doses of drugs to such patients until death ensued. Forty-nine percent of respondents involved staff, patients, and family in end-of-life decisions. Forty-five percent of respondents felt that an ethics consultation was useful in such situations. Physicians in the countries of southern Europe were less likely than those in the north to apply do-not-resuscitate orders, withhold treatment, and discuss such issues with the patients. However, they were more likely to value the opinion of an ethics consultant.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive care unit admissions are frequently limited by the availability of beds across Europe, particularly in the south and in the United Kingdom, yet 73% of intensivists still admit patients with no hope of survival. When treating patients with no hope of survival, 40% of intensivists will deliberately administer large doses of drugs until death ensues. There are interesting differences between what a physician actually does and what he or she believes should be done with regard to various ethical questions. Important differences in attitudes also exist between European countries.

摘要

目的

确定欧洲重症监护医师对临终决策的当前看法。

设计

向欧洲重症监护医学学会的所有医师会员发送了一份问卷。所有问卷均为匿名。

结果

对来自16个西欧国家的504份完整问卷进行了分析。87%的受访者为男性。46%的受访者表示,重症监护病房的收治通常或普遍受到床位短缺的影响,尤其是在南方。然而,73%的科室经常收治没有生存希望的患者,尽管只有33%的受访者认为这类患者应该被收治。80%的受访者认为应该应用书面的不进行心肺复苏医嘱,但只有58%的人这样做了,各国之间差异很大(从意大利的8%到荷兰的91%)。93%的医生有时会对没有有意义生活希望的患者停止治疗,但停止治疗的情况较少见。40%的受访者表示,他们会故意给这类患者大剂量用药直至死亡。49%的受访者让工作人员、患者和家属参与临终决策。45%的受访者认为伦理咨询在这种情况下有用。与北方国家的医生相比,南欧国家的医生不太可能应用不进行心肺复苏医嘱、停止治疗以及与患者讨论此类问题。然而,他们更有可能重视伦理顾问的意见。

结论

在欧洲,重症监护病房的收治经常受到床位可用性的限制,尤其是在南方和英国,但73%的重症监护医生仍然收治没有生存希望的患者。在治疗没有生存希望的患者时,40%的重症监护医生会故意大剂量用药直至死亡。在各种伦理问题上,医生实际所做的与他们认为应该做的之间存在有趣的差异。欧洲国家之间在态度上也存在重要差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验