Morton Donald L, Cochran Alistair J, Thompson John F, Elashoff Robert, Essner Richard, Glass Edwin C, Mozzillo Nicola, Nieweg Omgo E, Roses Daniel F, Hoekstra Harald J, Karakousis Constantine P, Reintgen Douglas S, Coventry Brendon J, Wang He-jing
John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.
Ann Surg. 2005 Sep;242(3):302-11; discussion 311-3. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000181092.50141.fa.
The objective of this study was to evaluate, in an international multicenter phase III trial, the accuracy, use, and morbidity of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy (LM/SNB) for staging the regional nodal basin of patients with early-stage melanoma.
Since our introduction of LM/SNB in 1990, this technique has been widely adopted and has become part of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Eleven years ago, the authors began the international Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I) to compare 2 treatment approaches: wide excision (WE) plus LM/SNB with immediate complete lymphadenectomy (CLND) for sentinel node (SN) metastases, and WE plus postoperative observation with CLND delayed until the subsequent development of clinically evident nodal metastases.
After each center achieved 85% accuracy of SN identification during a 30-case learning phase, patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (> or =1 mm with Clark level > or =III, or any thickness with Clark level > or =IV) were randomly assigned in a 4:6 ratio to WE plus observation (WEO) with delayed CLND for nodal recurrence, or to WE plus LM/SNB with immediate CLND for SN metastasis. The accuracy of LM/SNB was determined by comparing the rates of SN identification and the incidence of SN metastases in the LM/SNB group versus the subsequent development of nodal metastases in the regional nodal basin of those patients with tumor-negative SNs. Early morbidity of LM/SNB was evaluated by comparing complication rates between the 2 treatment groups. Trial accrual was completed on March 31, 2002, after enrollment of 2001 patients.
Initial SN identification rate was 95.3% overall: 99.3% for the groin, 95.3% for the axilla, and 84.5% for the neck basins. The rate of false-negative LM/SNB during the trial phase, as measured by nodal recurrence in a tumor-negative dissected SN basin, decreased with increasing case volume at each center: 10.3% for the first 25 cases versus 5.2% after 25 cases. There were no operative mortalities. The low (10.1%) complication rate after LM/SNB increased to 37.2% with the addition of CLND; CLND also increased the severity of complications.
LM/SNB is a safe, low-morbidity procedure for staging the regional nodal basin in early melanoma. Even after a 30-case learning phase and 25 additional LM/SNB cases, the accuracy of LM/SNB continues to increase with a center's experience. LM/SNB should become standard care for staging the regional lymph nodes of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma.
本研究的目的是在一项国际多中心III期试验中,评估术中淋巴管造影和前哨淋巴结活检(LM/SNB)用于早期黑色素瘤患者区域淋巴结分期的准确性、应用情况及发病率。
自1990年我们引入LM/SNB以来,该技术已被广泛采用,并已成为美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统的一部分。11年前,作者启动了国际多中心选择性淋巴结清扫试验(MSLT-I),以比较两种治疗方法:广泛切除(WE)加LM/SNB并对前哨淋巴结(SN)转移进行即刻完全淋巴结清扫(CLND),以及WE加术后观察,CLND延迟至随后出现临床明显的淋巴结转移。
在每个中心的30例学习阶段达到85%的SN识别准确率后,将原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者(厚度≥1mm且Clark分级≥III级,或任何厚度且Clark分级≥IV级)按4:6的比例随机分配至WE加观察(WEO)组,出现淋巴结复发时延迟行CLND,或分配至WE加LM/SNB组并对SN转移进行即刻CLND。通过比较LM/SNB组的SN识别率和SN转移发生率与肿瘤阴性SN患者区域淋巴结区域随后出现的淋巴结转移情况,来确定LM/SNB的准确性。通过比较两个治疗组的并发症发生率来评估LM/SNB的早期发病率。在纳入2001例患者后,于2002年3月31日完成试验入组。
总体初始SN识别率为95.3%:腹股沟为99.3%,腋窝为95.3%,颈部淋巴结区域为84.5%。在试验阶段,以肿瘤阴性解剖的SN区域的淋巴结复发衡量的LM/SNB假阴性率,随着每个中心病例数的增加而降低:前25例为10.3%,25例后为5.2%。无手术死亡病例。LM/SNB后的低并发症率(10.1%)在加行CLND后升至37.2%;CLND也增加了并发症的严重程度。
LM/SNB是一种用于早期黑色素瘤区域淋巴结分期的安全、低发病率的方法。即使在30例学习阶段和另外25例LM/SNB病例之后,LM/SNB的准确性仍随着中心经验的增加而提高。LM/SNB应成为原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者区域淋巴结分期的标准治疗方法。