• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在地方法院设立精神科联络计划:问题与实际情况。

Setting up psychiatric liaison schemes to magistrates' courts: problems and practicalities.

作者信息

James D V, Hamilton L W

机构信息

Royal Free Hospital, Hampstead, London.

出版信息

Med Sci Law. 1992 Apr;32(2):167-76. doi: 10.1177/106002809203200212.

DOI:10.1177/106002809203200212
PMID:1614302
Abstract

Guidelines are set out to aid those wishing to establish psychiatric liaison services to magistrates' courts, as recommended by the Home Office. The account is based upon 20 months' experience of running such a scheme at Clerkenwell magistrates' court in inner London. The practical problems in initiating such a service are explored together with difficulties likely to be encountered in its running. These include questions of personnel, interviewing facilities, relations with other disciplines, legal issues concerning the Mental Health Act and problems encountered in negotiating with catchment area services. Suggestions are given as to how difficulties may be overcome. The future of liaison schemes to magistrates' courts is discussed.

摘要

按照内政部的建议,制定了相关指南,以帮助那些希望在治安法庭设立精神科联络服务的人。本文基于在伦敦市中心克莱肯韦尔治安法庭开展此类计划20个月的经验。探讨了启动此类服务时的实际问题以及运行过程中可能遇到的困难。这些问题包括人员问题、面谈设施、与其他学科的关系、与《精神健康法》相关的法律问题以及与服务覆盖地区各机构协商时遇到的问题。针对如何克服这些困难给出了建议。还讨论了治安法庭联络计划的未来。

相似文献

1
Setting up psychiatric liaison schemes to magistrates' courts: problems and practicalities.在地方法院设立精神科联络计划:问题与实际情况。
Med Sci Law. 1992 Apr;32(2):167-76. doi: 10.1177/106002809203200212.
2
The Clerkenwell scheme: assessing efficacy and cost of a psychiatric liaison service to a magistrates' court.克拉肯韦尔计划:评估为治安法庭提供的精神科联络服务的效果和成本。
BMJ. 1991 Aug 3;303(6797):282-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6797.282.
3
Psychiatric support to magistrates' courts.为治安法庭提供精神科支持。
Med Sci Law. 2003 Jul;43(3):255-9. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.43.3.255.
4
An evaluation of psychiatric support to magistrates' courts.对治安法庭精神科支持服务的评估。
Med Sci Law. 2004 Jul;44(3):193-6. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.44.3.193.
5
Diversion from custody. I: Psychiatric assessment at the magistrates' court.保释期间转移监管。一:治安法庭的精神病学评估。
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;162:325-30. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.3.325.
6
Assessment of the perceived need for a psychiatric service to a magistrates' court.对治安法庭精神科服务感知需求的评估。
Med Sci Law. 1997 Apr;37(2):161-4. doi: 10.1177/002580249703700212.
7
[Ethical problems of insanity].[精神错乱的伦理问题]
Psychiatr Pol. 1991 May-Aug;25(3-4):119-24.
8
National survey of current arrangements for diversion from custody in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士羁押转处现行安排的全国性调查。
BMJ. 1992 Nov 28;305(6865):1322-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6865.1322.
9
Mental disorder amongst defendants in Liverpool Magistrates' Court.利物浦地方法院被告中的精神障碍问题。
Med Sci Law. 1994 Oct;34(4):279-83. doi: 10.1177/002580249403400402.
10
[Opinion of the Polish Psychiatric Association Management Office and Polish consultants about the use of forensic psychiatry in expert court testimony].[波兰精神病学协会管理办公室及波兰顾问关于法医精神病学在专家法庭证词中的应用的意见]
Psychiatr Pol. 2004 Mar-Apr;38(2):198-200.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a psychiatric court liaison scheme in north London.伦敦北部一项精神病法庭联络计划的评估。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):531-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.531.
2
National survey of current arrangements for diversion from custody in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士羁押转处现行安排的全国性调查。
BMJ. 1992 Nov 28;305(6865):1322-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6865.1322.