McDonough Kathleen H, Virag Jitka Ismail
Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Front Biosci. 2006 Jan 1;11:23-32. doi: 10.2741/1777.
Sepsis, bacteremia and inflammation cause myocardial depression. The mechanism of the dysfunction is not clearly established partly because dysfunction can be elicited by many different mechanisms which can all manifest in disruption of myocardial mechanical function. In addition the models of sepsis and bacteremia and inflammation may vary drastically in the sequence of the coordinated immune response to the inflammatory or septic stimulus. Patterns of cytokine expression can vary as can other responses of the immune system. Patterns of neurohumoral activation in response to the stress of sepsis or bacteremia or inflammation can also vary in both magnitude of response and temporal sequence of response. Stress induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system and humoral responses to stress have a wide range of intensity that can be elicited. The fairly uniform response of the myocardium indicating cardiac dysfunction is surprisingly constant. Systolic performance, as measured by stroke volume or cardiac output and pressure work as estimated by ventricular pressure, are impaired when myocardial contraction is compromised. At times, diastolic function, assessed by ventricular relaxation and filling, is impaired. In addition to the dysfunction that occurs, there is a longer term response of the myocardium to sepsis, and this response is similar to that which is elicited in the heart by multiple brief ischemia/reperfusion episodes and by numerous pharmacological agents as well as heat stress and modified forms of lipopolysaccharide. The myocardium develops protection after an initial stress such that during a second stress, the myocardium does not exhibit as much damage as does a non-protected heart. Many agents can induce this protection which has been termed preconditioning. Both early preconditioning (protection that is measurable min to hours after the initial stimulus) and late preconditioning (protection that is measurable hours to days after the initial trigger or stimulus) are effective in protecting the heart from prolonged ischemia and reperfusion injury. Understanding the mechanisms of sepsis/bacteremia induced dysfunction and protection and if the dysfunction and protection are the products of the same intracellular pathways is important in protecting the heart from failing to perform adequately during severe sepsis and/or septic shock and for understanding the multitude of mechanism by which the myocardium maintains reserve capacity.
脓毒症、菌血症和炎症可导致心肌抑制。这种功能障碍的机制尚未完全明确,部分原因是功能障碍可由多种不同机制引发,而这些机制都可能表现为心肌机械功能的破坏。此外,脓毒症、菌血症和炎症的模型在对炎症或感染性刺激的协同免疫反应顺序上可能有很大差异。细胞因子表达模式以及免疫系统的其他反应可能各不相同。对脓毒症、菌血症或炎症应激的神经体液激活模式在反应强度和反应时间顺序上也可能有所不同。应激诱导的交感神经系统激活和对应激的体液反应具有广泛的强度范围。心肌功能障碍的相当一致的反应令人惊讶地恒定。当心肌收缩受损时,通过每搏量或心输出量测量的收缩功能以及通过心室压力估计的压力功会受损。有时,通过心室舒张和充盈评估的舒张功能也会受损。除了发生的功能障碍外,心肌对脓毒症还有长期反应,这种反应类似于心脏在多次短暂缺血/再灌注发作、多种药物以及热应激和修饰形式的脂多糖作用下所引发的反应。心肌在初次应激后会产生保护作用,使得在第二次应激期间,心肌不像未受保护的心脏那样表现出那么多损伤。许多药物都可以诱导这种被称为预处理的保护作用。早期预处理(在初始刺激后数分钟至数小时可测量的保护作用)和晚期预处理(在初始触发或刺激后数小时至数天可测量的保护作用)都能有效保护心脏免受长时间缺血和再灌注损伤。了解脓毒症/菌血症诱导的功能障碍和保护的机制,以及功能障碍和保护是否是同一细胞内途径的产物,对于保护心脏在严重脓毒症和/或感染性休克期间充分发挥功能以及理解心肌维持储备能力的多种机制非常重要。