Tabaee Abtin, Geng Elvin, Lin Jerry, Kakoullis Stylianos, McDonald Brian, Rodriguez Hector, Chong David
Departments of Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2005 Sep;115(9):1685-90. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000175539.25182.2A.
To investigate a correlation between neck length and the incidence of complications after both percutaneous and surgical tracheotomy (ST) and to compare the relative safety of the two procedures at our institution.
Prospective, randomized study of patients undergoing tracheotomy at a tertiary care center.
Forty-three patients evaluated for tracheotomy at our institution between the years 2003 and 2004 were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to receive either an ST or a percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy (PDT). All patients underwent standardized measurement of the cricosternal distance (CSD) in the neutral and extended positions before the procedure. Demographic and procedural variables were recorded, and the occurrence of postoperative complications was followed for 1 week.
PDT was performed in 29 patients and ST in 14 patients. The mean CSD of 2.7 cm increased to 3.7 cm after extension with a shoulder roll. PDT required less time (mean 8 vs. 23 minutes) and resulted in less blood loss compared with ST. A trend toward a higher incidence of complications with PDT (40%) compared with ST (7%) and in the first half of our series (learning curve) was noted. This, however, did not reach statistical significance. There was no correlation between the incidence of complications and neck length as determined by the CSD in either group of patients.
We failed to demonstrate a correlation between CSD and tracheotomy related complications. Patients with short necks may be at no higher risk during either a PDT or ST. Experience, awareness of complications, and a dedicated team approach are necessary for the safe performance of PDT.
研究颈部长度与经皮气管切开术和外科气管切开术(ST)后并发症发生率之间的相关性,并比较这两种手术在本机构的相对安全性。
对一家三级医疗中心接受气管切开术的患者进行前瞻性随机研究。
2003年至2004年间在本机构接受气管切开术评估的43例患者纳入研究,并随机分配接受ST或经皮扩张气管切开术(PDT)。所有患者在手术前均在中立位和伸展位进行了标准化的环状胸骨距离(CSD)测量。记录人口统计学和手术变量,并对术后并发症的发生情况进行为期1周的随访。
29例患者接受了PDT,14例患者接受了ST。使用肩垫伸展后,平均CSD从2.7 cm增加到3.7 cm。与ST相比,PDT所需时间更少(平均8分钟对23分钟),失血量也更少。与ST(7%)相比,PDT(40%)以及在我们系列研究的前半部分(学习曲线)中并发症发生率有升高趋势,但未达到统计学意义。两组患者中,并发症发生率与通过CSD确定的颈部长度之间均无相关性。
我们未能证明CSD与气管切开术相关并发症之间存在相关性。短颈患者在接受PDT或ST时可能没有更高的风险。经验、对并发症的认识以及专业团队的方法对于安全实施PDT是必要的。