Karle B, Mayer B, Kitzinger H B, Fröhner S, Schmitt R, Krimmer H
Klinische Abteilung für Wiederherstellende und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Medizinische Universität, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien, Osterreich.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Aug;37(4):260-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865895.
Traditionally acute scaphoid fractures were treated by immobilization. As a consequence we have to deal with a high number of scaphoid non-unions or SNAC wrists. A study of 30 patients with scaphoid non-union showed that only 30% (9 patients) have not seen a doctor, while the majority of the patients (70%, 21 patients) were treated by a physician after trauma. In 15 (71.4%) of these 21 patients a missed diagnosis and in 6 (28.6%) a failed conservative treatment of the scaphoid fracture were the reasons for scaphoid non-union. Therefore, improvements in the diagnosis and therapy of scaphoid fractures are urgently needed. Herbert's classification of scaphoid fractures provides the underlying rationale for treatment according to the fracture type seen on X-ray. Differentiation between stable and unstable fractures sometimes is difficult from conventional X-rays. In these cases we recommend a CT bone scan in the long axis of the scaphoid. According to the CT scan we modified Herbert's classification: undisplaced waist fractures are classified as stable and can be treated conservatively or can be stabilized percutaneously using minimally invasive procedures. Comminuted or displaced fractures are classified as unstable and need operative treatment because of the increased risk of scaphoid non-union after plaster immobilization. Fractures of the proximal pole of the scaphoid should be treated operatively by internal fixation, even if they are not displaced, because of the reduced perfusion. We recommend a CT scan of the scaphoid, if there is any doubt about the diagnosis or the stability of the scaphoid fracture. In any case, a CT scan has to be ordered to justify a conservative treatment.
传统上,急性舟骨骨折通过固定治疗。因此,我们不得不应对大量舟骨不愈合或舟月骨进行性塌陷(SNAC)腕关节的情况。一项对30例舟骨不愈合患者的研究表明,只有30%(9例)患者未就医,而大多数患者(70%,21例)在受伤后接受了医生治疗。在这21例患者中,15例(71.4%)是漏诊,6例(28.6%)是舟骨骨折保守治疗失败,这些是舟骨不愈合的原因。因此,迫切需要改进舟骨骨折的诊断和治疗方法。赫伯特(Herbert)对舟骨骨折的分类为根据X线所见骨折类型进行治疗提供了基本原理。从传统X线片有时很难区分稳定和不稳定骨折。在这些情况下,我们建议对舟骨长轴进行CT骨扫描。根据CT扫描结果,我们对赫伯特分类进行了修改:无移位的腰部骨折被归类为稳定骨折,可以保守治疗,也可以采用微创手术经皮固定。粉碎性或移位骨折被归类为不稳定骨折,由于石膏固定后舟骨不愈合风险增加,需要手术治疗。舟骨近端骨折即使无移位,也应通过内固定进行手术治疗,因为其血供减少。如果对舟骨骨折的诊断或稳定性有任何疑问,我们建议进行舟骨CT扫描。在任何情况下,都必须进行CT扫描以证明保守治疗的合理性。