Arora R, Gschwentner M, Krappinger D, Lutz M, Blauth M, Gabl M
Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Jan;127(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0229-z. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
Nondisplaced scaphoid waist fractures treated with prolonged plaster immobilisation often lead in transient joint stiffness and to a delay in return to sport and work activity. The long time off work increases the work off compensation costs. Internal fixation of scaphoid fractures has resulted in a shorter time to union and to return to work and sports. This prospective study compares cast immobilisation with screw fixation and the direct cost with indirect cost of conservative and minimally invasive treatment of undisplaced scaphoid fractures.
Forty-seven patients with an acute nondisplaced waist fracture of the scaphoid were allocated into either cast immobilisation or internal screw fixation for this study. Cost data concerning the groups of nonoperated and operated patients were analysed. Range of wrist motion, grip strength, DASH-score, time to fracture union, return to work time and the needed physiotherapy at the final follow-up at 6 months were evaluated.
Twenty-one patients were included in the group of screw fixation and 23 patients were included in the group of cast immobilisation. At final follow-up there was no significant difference in the range of motion of the wrist or in grip strength. The operatively treated group had a better mean DASH-score than the conservative group. Fracture union was seen in the screw fixation group at a mean of 43 days and in the cast immobilisation group at a mean of 74 days (P < 0.5). The average time of return to work was 8 days for patients who had an internal screw fixation, while those treated with a cast returned to work at a mean of 55 days (P < 0.5). In total the internal fixation of undisplaced scaphoid fractures is less expensive than conservative treatment.
Internal screw fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid fractures had a shorter time to bony union and the patients returned earlier to work compared with cast immobilisation. Although it is assumed that operative treatment is more expensive, in this study the cost was not found to be higher.
采用长时间石膏固定治疗无移位的舟状骨腰部骨折,常导致关节短暂僵硬,并延迟恢复运动和工作。长时间缺勤会增加工伤赔偿成本。舟状骨骨折的内固定术可缩短骨折愈合时间以及恢复工作和运动的时间。本前瞻性研究比较了石膏固定与螺钉固定,以及无移位舟状骨骨折保守治疗和微创治疗的直接成本与间接成本。
本研究将47例急性无移位舟状骨腰部骨折患者分为石膏固定组或内螺钉固定组。分析了非手术和手术患者组的成本数据。评估了6个月最终随访时的腕关节活动范围、握力、DASH评分、骨折愈合时间、恢复工作时间以及所需的物理治疗。
螺钉固定组纳入21例患者,石膏固定组纳入23例患者。在最终随访时,腕关节活动范围或握力无显著差异。手术治疗组的平均DASH评分优于保守治疗组。螺钉固定组骨折平均在43天愈合,石膏固定组平均在74天愈合(P < 0.5)。接受内螺钉固定的患者平均8天恢复工作,而接受石膏治疗的患者平均55天恢复工作(P < 0.5)。总体而言,无移位舟状骨骨折的内固定术比保守治疗成本更低。
与石膏固定相比,无移位舟状骨骨折的内螺钉固定术骨折愈合时间更短,患者更早恢复工作。尽管一般认为手术治疗费用更高,但本研究未发现成本更高。