Lawton B W
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, UK.
Int J Audiol. 2005 Aug;44(8):444-51. doi: 10.1080/14992020500189062.
This paper questions the necessity for two calibration devices to measure the acoustic output from different types of audiometric earphones. International standards give the audiometric zero for TDH39 earphones on the IEC 60318-3 acoustic coupler; the IEC 60318-1 ear simulator is intended for other supra-aural earphone types. If hearing threshold samples from young, healthy ears were found to be more variable using TDH39 earphones, then that earphone and its coupler might be taken out of service. The audiological literature yielded threshold survey results for over 5100 otologically normal ears of subjects aged 31 years or less. These independent samples showed smaller variation for TDH39 samples than for samples using other earphones; this finding does not support abandoning the TDH39 and its coupler. Nevertheless, benefits accrue from calibrating TDH39 output to the audiometric zero as measured on the ear simulator.
本文质疑使用两种校准设备来测量不同类型听力计耳机声学输出的必要性。国际标准规定了在IEC 60318-3声学耦合器上TDH39耳机的听力计零值;IEC 60318-1耳模拟器适用于其他头戴式耳机类型。如果发现使用TDH39耳机时,来自年轻健康耳朵的听力阈值样本变化更大,那么该耳机及其耦合器可能会被停用。听力学文献给出了5100多名31岁及以下听力正常受试者耳朵的阈值调查结果。这些独立样本显示,TDH39样本的变化比使用其他耳机的样本更小;这一发现不支持放弃TDH39及其耦合器。然而,将TDH39的输出校准到在耳模拟器上测得的听力计零值是有好处的。