Bedi K S
Department of Anatomy, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.
Physiol Behav. 1992 May;51(5):1001-7. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90084-f.
Experiments to determine whether undernutrition during early life results in deficits in spatial learning behavior has produced conflicting results. It was hypothesized that this may be due to the differing degrees of undernutrition used in the various studies, and/or to the timing of the testing procedures with respect to the period of food deprivation. These possibilities were tested by undernourishing rats between birth and 30 days of age to two different levels (i.e., level-1 and level-2). The degree of undernutrition was greater at level-2 than level-1. Behavioral testing of these rats and well-fed controls was carried out in the Morris water maze when they were between either 35 and 65 or 170 and 200 days of age. Statistical analyses of the escape latency data from these experiments revealed that rats tested almost immediately after the period of undernutrition have alterations in their spatial learning behavior compared with controls. However, even a short period of nutritional rehabilitation removed any differences between control and previously undernourished groups, irrespective of the level of undernutrition.
旨在确定生命早期营养不良是否会导致空间学习行为缺陷的实验产生了相互矛盾的结果。据推测,这可能是由于不同研究中使用的营养不良程度不同,和/或测试程序相对于食物剥夺期的时间安排不同。通过在出生至30日龄期间将大鼠营养不良至两种不同水平(即1级和2级)来检验这些可能性。2级的营养不良程度比1级更大。当这些大鼠和喂养良好的对照大鼠分别处于35至65日龄或170至200日龄时,在莫里斯水迷宫中对它们进行行为测试。对这些实验中逃避潜伏期数据的统计分析表明,与对照组相比,在营养不良期后几乎立即进行测试的大鼠在空间学习行为上有改变。然而,即使是短时间的营养恢复也消除了对照组和先前营养不良组之间的任何差异,无论营养不良的水平如何。