Kato Tsuyoshi, Haro Hirotaka, Komori Hiromichi, Shinomiya Kenichi
Department of Spinal and Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-5819, Japan.
Spine J. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):479-88. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.01.010.
Various materials have been tested for their ability to maintain a barrier between muscles and epidural space in order to physically or chemically inhibit scar ingrowths. Hyaluronic acid (HA) solution and gel have been reported to be effective in preventing adhesions postlaminectomy; however, neither has been used clinically after spinal surgery.
To determine the efficacy of HA sheet for the prevention of postlaminectomy adhesions compared with that of HA gel or another sheet.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: An animal model of lumbar laminectomy in rabbits was used to study postoperative scar tissue formation around the spinal cord. The histologic effects of HA sheet were compared with those of Gelfoam (GF) and further evaluated by an inflammation model using rhTNF-alpha.
Rabbit.
Histologic examination.
Five rabbits were killed at 2, 4, 8, and 24 weeks after laminectomy, respectively. Another 18 rabbits were examined in an environment of active inflammation experimentally induced by rhTNF-alpha to compare the effects of HA sheet with those of GF or HA gel. Histologic examination was performed to quantitatively assess invasive scar formation or inflammation postlaminectomy, and then, the histologic effects of HA sheet were compared with those of GF or HA gel.
In the HA group, significantly, the area of subarachnoid space was larger, distance from the surface of dura to scar tissues was greater, the number of inflammatory cells in the scar tissues at the site of laminectomy was less, and enlargement of dura was suppressed. Using an inflammation model, we also demonstrated the efficacy of HA sheet treatment.
In an experimental laminectomy model, HA sheet formed a solid interpositional membrane barrier and exhibited anti-inflammatory activity. Further investigations will be needed for HA sheet to be used clinically.
为了通过物理或化学方式抑制瘢痕向内生长,人们对多种能够在肌肉和硬膜外腔之间维持屏障作用的材料进行了测试。据报道,透明质酸(HA)溶液和凝胶在预防椎板切除术后粘连方面有效;然而,这两种材料均未在脊柱手术后临床应用。
与HA凝胶或另一种薄片相比,确定HA薄片预防椎板切除术后粘连的疗效。
研究设计/场所:采用兔腰椎椎板切除动物模型研究脊髓周围术后瘢痕组织形成。将HA薄片的组织学效应与明胶海绵(GF)进行比较,并通过使用重组人肿瘤坏死因子-α(rhTNF-α)的炎症模型进一步评估。
兔。
组织学检查。
分别在椎板切除术后2周、4周、8周和24周处死5只兔。另外18只兔在由rhTNF-α实验诱导的活跃炎症环境中进行检查,以比较HA薄片与GF或HA凝胶的效果。进行组织学检查以定量评估椎板切除术后侵入性瘢痕形成或炎症,然后将HA薄片的组织学效应与GF或HA凝胶进行比较。
在HA组中,蛛网膜下腔面积显著更大,从硬脑膜表面到瘢痕组织的距离更远,椎板切除部位瘢痕组织中的炎症细胞数量更少,硬脑膜扩大受到抑制。使用炎症模型,我们还证明了HA薄片治疗的疗效。
在实验性椎板切除模型中,HA薄片形成了坚实的插入性膜屏障并表现出抗炎活性。HA薄片要应用于临床还需要进一步研究。