Andresen David R, Marsolek Chad J
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, 420 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Brain Cogn. 2005 Nov;59(2):135-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.010. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
Past research indicates that specific shape recognition and spatial-relations encoding rely on subsystems that exhibit right-hemisphere advantages, whereas abstract shape recognition and spatial-relations encoding rely on subsystems that exhibit left-hemisphere advantages. Given these apparent regularities, we tested whether asymmetries in shape processing are causally related to asymmetries in spatial-relations processing. We examined performance in four tasks using the same stimuli with divided-visual-field presentations. Importantly, the asymmetry observed in any one task did not correlate with the asymmetries observed in the other tasks in ways predicted by extant theories. Asymmetries in shape processing and spatial-relations encoding may not be due to a common causal force influencing multiple subsystems.
过去的研究表明,特定形状识别和空间关系编码依赖于表现出右半球优势的子系统,而抽象形状识别和空间关系编码则依赖于表现出左半球优势的子系统。鉴于这些明显的规律,我们测试了形状处理中的不对称是否与空间关系处理中的不对称存在因果关系。我们使用相同的刺激物,通过视野分割呈现来检验四项任务中的表现。重要的是,在任何一项任务中观察到的不对称与其他任务中观察到的不对称之间,并不以现有理论所预测的方式相关。形状处理和空间关系编码中的不对称可能并非源于影响多个子系统的共同因果力。