Suppr超能文献

上下视野中知觉不对称的差异。

Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2011 Apr 28;1387:108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.063. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

Abstract

A leftward spatial bias has been observed with visuospatial attention tasks, including line bisection and the greyscales task. Upper and lower visual field differences have been observed on various tasks, with a lower visual field advantage occurring for motion, global processing and coordinate spatial judgments. Upper visual field advantages occur for visual search, local processing and categorical judgments. In perceptual asymmetries research, upper and lower visual field differences have not typically been scored separately, as most presentations have been central. Mixed results have made it difficult to determine whether lateral biases are stronger in the upper or the lower visual field. As length of presentation time differed in prior studies, this factor was examined to determine whether it would lead differential biases to emerge in each visual field. The greyscales task was used to investigate the interaction of visual field and presentation time within subjects (N=43). Eye tracking was used during the task and supported the hypothesis of a stronger left bias in the lower visual field. Presentation time and visual field interacted to influence performance. Prolonged presentation led to a stronger leftward bias in the lower visual field whereas the leftward bias was stronger in the upper visual field during brief presentation. Results showed a relation between the lower and left visual fields and the upper and right visual fields, which has not previously been shown in perceptual asymmetries. Further, it is suggested that functional differences between the visual streams could underlie the visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.

摘要

已观察到在视空间注意任务中存在左侧空间偏向,包括线二分和灰度任务。在各种任务中观察到上下视野差异,在运动、全局处理和坐标空间判断中出现下视野优势。在上视野优势中观察到视觉搜索、局部处理和类别判断。在感知不对称研究中,上下视野差异通常未分别评分,因为大多数呈现是中心的。混合结果使得难以确定侧向偏差在上视野还是下视野中更强。由于先前研究中呈现时间长度不同,因此检查了该因素,以确定它是否会导致在每个视野中出现不同的偏差。灰度任务用于在受试者内(N=43)研究视野和呈现时间的相互作用。在任务期间使用眼动追踪,并支持在下视野中存在更强的左侧偏差的假设。呈现时间和视野相互作用以影响性能。长时间呈现导致下视野中更强的左侧偏差,而在短时间呈现期间,上视野中左侧偏差更强。结果显示在感知不对称中以前未显示出下视野和左视野与上视野和右视野之间的关系。此外,有人认为视觉流之间的功能差异可能是感知不对称中视野差异的基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验