Wiley Miriam M
The Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Health Econ. 2005 Sep;14(Suppl 1):S169-86. doi: 10.1002/hec.1034.
As the Irish health system embarks upon its first major structural reorganisation in over 30 years, developments within this system over the past two decades are assessed. Real cuts in health expenditure achieved in the 1980s contrast sharply with the unprecedented increase in resources devoted to the health system in the 1990s. While successive statements of health strategy have prioritised the objectives of equity, efficiency and quality of care, questions arise regarding the return achieved with the increased investment. With higher levels of economic growth, more people have been buying private health insurance such that almost half the population are now privately insured. At the same time, the numbers with eligibility for health services without charge have decreased while those from lower socio-economic groups continue to have higher levels of utilisation. Equity issues arise, however, with regard to access to public hospitals as the rate of growth in admissions for private patients outstrips that for public patients. The establishment of a National Treatment Purchase Fund to purchase treatment in private facilities for public patients on waiting lists raises efficiency and equity questions as the treatment of private patients in public hospitals is heavily subsidised while the State pays full cost for the treatment of public patients in private facilities.
随着爱尔兰医疗系统着手进行30多年来的首次重大结构重组,对该系统在过去二十年中的发展情况进行了评估。20世纪80年代实际削减医疗支出的情况与90年代投入医疗系统的资源前所未有的增加形成鲜明对比。尽管历届卫生战略声明都将公平、效率和医疗质量目标列为优先事项,但对于增加投资所取得的回报仍存在疑问。随着经济增长水平提高,越来越多的人购买了私人医疗保险,以至于现在几乎一半的人口都有私人保险。与此同时,有资格免费享受医疗服务的人数减少,而社会经济地位较低群体的利用率仍然较高。然而,在公立医院就诊机会方面出现了公平问题,因为私立患者的住院人数增长率超过了公立患者。设立国家治疗采购基金,为候诊名单上的公立患者在私立机构购买治疗服务,引发了效率和公平问题,因为公立医院中私立患者的治疗得到大量补贴,而国家为公立患者在私立机构的治疗支付全额费用。