Lim David, Robinovitch Stephen, Goodman David
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Sep;15(5):313-9. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000180019.22018.3c.
To determine if impact responses (stiffness and damping values) of the jaw and neck are significantly different between mouthguards of varying material and manufacturing properties, in controlled conditions involving specified upper limb orientation and applied loading.
Quasi-experimental design.
Simon Fraser University biomechanical laboratory.
Twelve male subjects between the ages of 19 to 28 participated in this study. All subjects were healthy, had no missing teeth, and had no mechanical (orthodontic) appliances.
For each condition, the system stiffness and damping values were estimated using the free vibration technique. Stiffness and damping values are relevant because they are the major determinants of impact force and, potentially, injury risk. It is the first study to show experimentally the quantitative effects of mouthguard in situ.
All the mouthguards lowered the system stiffness as compared with the no mouthguard condition (P < 0.001). There was no observed effect on stiffness between the 2 limb orientation positions. Excitation weight had an unexpected effect on system stiffness (P = 0.041), with increasing weight leading to increased stiffness.
The findings suggest that wearing any mouthguard is better than wearing none at all due to their ability to reduce system stiffness and damping values after a blow to the chin.
在涉及特定上肢方位和施加负荷的受控条件下,确定不同材料和制造特性的护齿器在颌部和颈部的冲击响应(刚度和阻尼值)是否存在显著差异。
准实验设计。
西蒙弗雷泽大学生物力学实验室。
12名年龄在19至28岁之间的男性受试者参与了本研究。所有受试者均健康,无缺牙,且无机械(正畸)矫治器。
对于每种情况,使用自由振动技术估算系统刚度和阻尼值。刚度和阻尼值具有相关性,因为它们是冲击力以及潜在受伤风险的主要决定因素。这是第一项通过实验展示护齿器原位定量效果的研究。
与不使用护齿器的情况相比,所有护齿器均降低了系统刚度(P < 0.001)。在两个肢体方位位置之间未观察到对刚度的影响。激励重量对系统刚度有意外影响(P = 0.041),重量增加导致刚度增加。
研究结果表明,由于护齿器在下巴受到撞击后具有降低系统刚度和阻尼值的能力,佩戴任何护齿器都比不佩戴要好。