Takeda Tomotaka, Ishigami Keiichi, Nakajima Kazunori, Naitoh Kaoru, Kurokawa Katsuhide, Handa Jun, Shomura Masahito, Regner Connell Wayne
Department of Sports Dentistry, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan.
Dent Traumatol. 2008 Jun;24(3):360-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00576.x.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence anterior occlusion, of mouthguards, has on protecting against a direct collision to the maxillary anterior teeth. In other words, the support mandibular dentition has when wearing a mouthguard. Two types of mouthguards were used for this study, one with an appropriate anterior occlusion or a mouthguard with positive anterior occlusion (MGAO+) and another which was a single-layer mouthguard lacking the same occlusion or a mouthguard with negative anterior occlusion (MGAO-) but with the same thickness on the buccal side. The instruments used for testing were a pendulum-type impact device with two interchangeable impact objects (a steel ball and a baseball), with a plastic jaw model having artificial teeth. Four testing conditions were observed: one with the jaw open without a mouthguard (Open NoMG), the second with the jaw clenching (loaded with 30 kg weight) without a mouthguard (Clench. NoMG), the third with the jaw clenching with MGAO- (Clench. MGAO-) and the last with the jaw clenching with MGAO+ (Clench. MGAO+). The results are as follows: both types of mouthguards showed the effects in reducing the distortion of the teeth. However, the effect was significantly obvious (steel ball = about 57% shock absorption ability, baseball = about 26%) in the mouthguard with anterior occlusion or support by lower dentition through mouthguard (Clench. MGAO+) than Clench. MGAO-. Thus, the influence of anterior occlusion of mouthguards or the support of mandibular dentition through wearing a mouthguard (MGAO+) is indispensable in reducing the impact force and tooth distortion. The results of this research should further contribute to the establishment of guidelines for safer mouthguards.
本研究的目的是阐明口腔防护器的前牙咬合对防止上颌前牙受到直接碰撞的影响。换句话说,就是佩戴口腔防护器时下颌牙列所提供的支撑作用。本研究使用了两种类型的口腔防护器,一种具有合适的前牙咬合,即正前牙咬合口腔防护器(MGAO+),另一种是单层且缺乏相同咬合的口腔防护器,即负前牙咬合口腔防护器(MGAO-),但两者颊侧厚度相同。用于测试的仪器是一个摆锤式冲击装置,带有两个可互换的冲击物体(一个钢球和一个棒球),以及一个带有假牙的塑料颌骨模型。观察了四种测试条件:第一种是不戴口腔防护器时颌骨张开(张开无防护器,Open NoMG),第二种是不戴口腔防护器时颌骨咬紧(加载30千克重量)(咬紧无防护器,Clench. NoMG),第三种是佩戴MGAO-时颌骨咬紧(咬紧MGAO-,Clench. MGAO-),最后一种是佩戴MGAO+时颌骨咬紧(咬紧MGAO+,Clench. MGAO+)。结果如下:两种类型的口腔防护器都显示出减少牙齿变形的效果。然而,与咬紧MGAO-相比,具有前牙咬合或通过口腔防护器获得下颌牙列支撑的口腔防护器(咬紧MGAO+)的效果显著更明显(钢球 = 约57%的减震能力,棒球 = 约26%)。因此,口腔防护器的前牙咬合或通过佩戴口腔防护器(MGAO+)获得下颌牙列的支撑在降低冲击力和牙齿变形方面是不可或缺的。本研究结果应进一步有助于制定更安全的口腔防护器指南。