Hutchinson M Katherine, Holtman Matthew C
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 420 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6096, USA.
Res Nurs Health. 2005 Oct;28(5):408-18. doi: 10.1002/nur.20093.
Nurses and other health researchers are often concerned with infrequently occurring, repeatable, health-related events such as number of hospitalizations, pregnancies, or visits to a health care provider. Reports on the occurrence of such discrete events take the form of non-negative integer or count data. Because the counts of infrequently occurring events tend to be non-normally distributed and highly positively skewed, the use of ordinary least squares (OLS) regression with non-transformed data has several shortcomings. Techniques such as Poisson regression and negative binomial regression may provide more appropriate alternatives for analyzing these data. The purpose of this article is to compare and contrast the use of these three methods for the analysis of infrequently occurring count data. The strengths, limitations, and special considerations of each approach are discussed. Data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health (AddHealth) are used for illustrative purposes.
护士和其他健康研究人员经常关注一些不常发生但可重复的、与健康相关的事件,如住院次数、怀孕次数或就医次数。关于此类离散事件发生情况的报告采用非负整数或计数数据的形式。由于不常发生事件的计数往往呈非正态分布且高度正偏态,对未转换数据使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归存在若干缺点。泊松回归和负二项回归等技术可能为分析这些数据提供更合适的替代方法。本文的目的是比较和对比这三种方法在分析不常发生的计数数据时的应用。讨论了每种方法的优点、局限性和特殊注意事项。为说明目的,使用了来自青少年健康全国纵向调查(AddHealth)的数据。