Van den Borre Laura, Gadeyne Sylvie, Devleesschauwer Brecht, Vanthomme Katrien
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Brussels Institute for Social and Population Studies (BRISPO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussel, Belgium.
Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 18;82(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01444-9.
This study aims to assess which population groups experienced the heaviest mortality burden during the first three COVID-19 waves in Belgium; and investigate potential changes in social differences in all-cause mortality during the epidemic and compared to the pre-COVID period.
Exhaustive all-cause mortality information (2015-2021) from the Belgian population register was linked to demographic and socioeconomic census and register data. Annual cohorts consisting of 6.5 million to 6.8 million persons were created selecting persons aged 35 and older. Excess mortality was investigated comparing the 137,354 deaths observed during the first three COVID-19 waves with mortality in the reference period 2015-2019. Methods of analysis include direct standardization and Poisson regression analyses.
Elderly men experienced the highest absolute mortality burden during all three COVID-waves, followed by elderly women, middle-aged men, and middle-aged women. Care home residents consistently experienced higher mortality rates during the first and second wave compared to peers living in other living arrangements. In wave 3, care home residents showed significant absolute mortality deficits compared to the reference period. When adjusting for all demographic and socioeconomic factors, the traditional pattern of educational and income mortality inequalities was found among the elderly population during the COVID-waves. In contrast, the educational mortality gap among middle-aged persons deepened during COVID-waves 2 and 3 with excess mortality between 19 and 30% observed among mainly lower-educated persons. Income mortality inequalities among middle-aged women and men remained stable or even diminished for some specific groups in some waves.
The widening educational mortality gap among middle-aged persons in successive waves suggest an important role of knowledge and associated educational resources during the COVID-19 epidemic. Belgium's broad implementation of public health control and prevention measures may have successfully averted a further widening of social mortality inequality between income groups and among the elderly population.
本研究旨在评估在比利时新冠疫情的前三波中,哪些人群承受了最重的死亡负担;并调查疫情期间全因死亡率的社会差异与新冠疫情前相比的潜在变化。
将比利时人口登记册中详尽的全因死亡信息(2015 - 2021年)与人口和社会经济普查及登记数据相链接。创建了由650万至680万人组成的年度队列,选取年龄在35岁及以上的人群。通过将在新冠疫情前三波中观察到的137,354例死亡与2015 - 2019年参考期内的死亡率进行比较,来研究超额死亡率。分析方法包括直接标准化和泊松回归分析。
在新冠疫情的所有三波中,老年男性承受的绝对死亡负担最高,其次是老年女性、中年男性和中年女性。与其他居住安排的同龄人相比,养老院居民在第一波和第二波期间的死亡率一直较高。在第三波中,与参考期相比,养老院居民的绝对死亡率显著下降。在对所有人口和社会经济因素进行调整后,在新冠疫情期间,老年人群中发现了传统的教育和收入死亡率不平等模式。相比之下,在新冠疫情的第二波和第三波期间,中年人的教育死亡率差距加深,主要是低教育程度人群的超额死亡率在19%至30%之间。在某些波次中,中年女性和男性的收入死亡率不平等在某些特定群体中保持稳定甚至有所减少。
在连续几波疫情中,中年人群中教育死亡率差距不断扩大,这表明知识和相关教育资源在新冠疫情期间发挥了重要作用。比利时广泛实施的公共卫生控制和预防措施可能成功避免了收入群体之间以及老年人群中社会死亡率不平等的进一步扩大。