Suppr超能文献

在英格兰普通医疗中对开具利培酮、喹硫平或奥氮平处方的患者(包括痴呆患者)进行的观察性队列研究中,脑血管意外和短暂性脑缺血发作发病率的比较

Comparison of incidence rates of cerebrovascular accidents and transient ischaemic attacks in observational cohort studies of patients prescribed risperidone, quetiapine or olanzapine in general practice in England including patients with dementia.

作者信息

Layton Deborah, Harris Scott, Wilton Lynda V, Shakir Saad A W

机构信息

Drug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall, Blundell Lane, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Psychopharmacol. 2005 Sep;19(5):473-82. doi: 10.1177/0269881105056524.

Abstract

Following changes in the safety information on the use of risperidone and olanzapine in elderly patients with dementia, data from prescription-event monitoring (PEM) studies of risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine were examined. The aim was to compare incidence rates for events reported as cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) during the first 180 days of treatment in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics for dementia or other indications, because of the possible association between dementia and stroke in users of atypical antipsychotics. A retrospective analysis of data from the three observational studies was conducted using Poisson regression modelling and survival analysis. Within the risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine cohorts, 23 (0.30%), 6 (0.35%) and 10 (0.11%) patients respectively, were reported to have had a CVA/TIA event. Age, sex and indication (dementia or other) were identified as important confounding variables; age being the most important. The crude rate ratios (RRs) for CVA/TIA for risperidone or quetiapine vs. olanzapine indicated an approximate threefold relative difference in rate during the first six months but after adjustment for age, sex and indication, the RRs were non-significant (1.2 (95% CI 0.5,3.0) and 2.1 (95% CI 0.6,7.7), respectively). For risperidone vs. quetiapine, crude and adjusted RRs were not significantly different. Of the three drugs, the time to event was shortest for risperidone and also shortest for risperidone or quetiapine users where the indication was dementia. The age and sex adjusted RR of CVA/TIA in patients prescribed risperidone for dementia vs. other indications was 6.7 (95% CI 2.4,18.9). The adjusted RRs for quetiapine, according to indication, could not be calculated due to missing information on age and sex. There were no cases of CVA/TIA with dementia for olanzapine, thus the RRs and time to event curves according to indication could not be examined. This study revealed no significant difference in the adjusted RR of CVA/TIA events in the first 180 days of treatment in patients prescribed risperidone or quetiapine when compared with olanzapine. However, dementia appears to be an important risk factor. These results should be considered alongside other pharmacoepidemiological studies on this topic.

摘要

在老年痴呆患者使用利培酮和奥氮平的安全信息发生变化后,对利培酮、喹硫平和奥氮平的处方事件监测(PEM)研究数据进行了检查。目的是比较因非典型抗精神病药物使用者中痴呆与中风可能存在关联,而在为痴呆或其他适应症开具非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患者中,治疗前180天内报告为脑血管意外(CVA)和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的事件发生率。使用泊松回归模型和生存分析对三项观察性研究的数据进行了回顾性分析。在利培酮、喹硫平和奥氮平队列中,分别有23例(0.30%)、6例(0.35%)和10例(0.11%)患者报告发生了CVA/TIA事件。年龄、性别和适应症(痴呆或其他)被确定为重要的混杂变量;年龄是最重要的。利培酮或喹硫平与奥氮平相比,CVA/TIA的粗率比(RRs)表明在前六个月发病率存在约三倍的相对差异,但在对年龄、性别和适应症进行调整后,RRs无统计学意义(分别为1.2(95%CI 0.5,3.0)和2.1(95%CI 0.6,7.7))。利培酮与喹硫平相比,粗RRs和调整后的RRs无显著差异。在这三种药物中,利培酮发生事件的时间最短,对于适应症为痴呆的利培酮或喹硫平使用者,发生事件的时间也最短。为痴呆开具利培酮的患者与其他适应症患者相比,年龄和性别调整后的CVA/TIA的RR为6.7(95%CI 2.4,18.9)。由于年龄和性别的信息缺失,无法根据适应症计算喹硫平的调整后RRs。奥氮平治疗痴呆患者未发生CVA/TIA病例,因此无法根据适应症检查RRs和事件发生时间曲线。本研究显示,与奥氮平相比,开具利培酮或喹硫平的患者在治疗前180天内CVA/TIA事件的调整后RR无显著差异。然而,痴呆似乎是一个重要的危险因素。这些结果应与关于该主题的其他药物流行病学研究一并考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验