Bussotti Filippo, Schaub Marcus, Cozzi Alberto, Gerosa Giacomo, Novak Kristopher, Hug Christian
Department of Plant Biology, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 28, 50144 Florence, Italy.
Environ Pollut. 2006 Mar;140(2):257-68. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.07.012. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
This paper aims to identify the problems regarding the evaluation of ozone (and ozone-like) symptoms, by examining the results of the 4th UN/ECE ICP-Forests Intercalibration Course for the assessment of ozone-induced visible symptoms. Trees, shrubs and herbaceous species were evaluated in a tree nursery, at Lattecaldo (Switzerland) and under open field conditions at Moggio (Italy). The main findings were: (i) the most expert surveyors tended to be grouped in the same cluster and, during the field exercises, they tended to assess in a more conservative manner compared to the less trained participants; (ii) the agreement was greater in assessing the absence rather than the presence of symptoms; (iii) typical interveinal stippling on the upper leaf surface was more accurately evaluated than discoloration; (iv) uncertainties resulted mainly for species which showed greater variability in their symptom manifestation, and for certain herbaceous species.
本文旨在通过研究第四届联合国欧洲经济委员会森林综合监测臭氧校准课程中评估臭氧(及类臭氧)症状的结果,来确定臭氧(及类臭氧)症状评估方面存在的问题。在瑞士拉泰卡尔多的一个苗圃以及意大利莫焦的野外条件下,对树木、灌木和草本植物进行了评估。主要发现如下:(i)最专业的调查员往往聚集在同一组,在实地操作中,与训练较少的参与者相比,他们的评估往往更为保守;(ii)在评估无症状而非有症状时,一致性更高;(iii)对叶片上表面典型的脉间点刻的评估比对变色的评估更准确;(iv)不确定性主要源于症状表现变异性较大的物种以及某些草本植物。