Suppr超能文献

高危非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架使用的频率、预测因素及结果

Frequency, predictors, and outcomes of drug-eluting stent utilization in patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Kandzari David E, Roe Matthew T, Ohman E Magnus, Milford-Beland Sarah, Chen Anita Y, Lytle Barbara L, Cohen David J, Smith Sidney C, Harrington Robert A, Gibler W Brian, Peterson Eric D

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute and Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 15;96(6):750-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.015.

Abstract

Despite the established benefit of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in improving clinical and angiographic outcomes in pivotal, randomized trials, relatively little is known regarding the frequency and patterns of DES use in clinical practice. To characterize DES use in a broad, unselected high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome population, we evaluated the frequency, patterns, and predictors of DES use among patients in the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines (CRUSADE) Quality Improvement Initiative who were selected to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Of 8,852 patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who underwent percutaneous revascularization at 262 hospitals between October 2003 and June 2004, 5,858 (66.2%) were treated with DESs and 2,994 (33.8%) were not. During a 9-month period, DES use increased considerably from 52.6% of cases in October 2003 to 78.5% in June 2004. Compared with the bare metal stent cohort, patients receiving DESs were more likely to be women and to have private insurance, but were less likely to present with positive cardiac markers or ST-segment depression. In adjusted analysis, death and recurrent infarction were significantly lower among the patients with a DES, yet early revascularization and treatment with guideline-recommended therapies were less frequent. In a multivariate model, significant (p <0.05) predictors of DES use included hyperlipidemia, elevated systolic blood pressure, private insurance, and treatment at a larger hospital. In conclusion, these findings not only identified differences in the selection and treatment of patients receiving bare metal stents versus DESs, but also demonstrated the increasing use of DESs in higher risk patients who have previously been excluded from randomized, pivotal trials.

摘要

尽管药物洗脱支架(DES)在关键的随机试验中已证实对改善临床和血管造影结果有益,但在临床实践中,对于DES的使用频率和模式却知之甚少。为了描述DES在广泛的、未经筛选的高危非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征人群中的使用情况,我们评估了参与美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南(CRUSADE)质量改进计划的不稳定型心绞痛患者快速风险分层以早期实施治疗抑制不良结局(CRUSADE)中接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者使用DES的频率、模式及预测因素。在2003年10月至2004年6月期间,262家医院对8852例高危非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行了经皮血管重建术,其中5858例(66.2%)接受了DES治疗,2994例(33.8%)未接受DES治疗。在9个月的时间里,DES的使用从2003年10月的52.6%大幅增加到2004年6月的78.5%。与裸金属支架组相比,接受DES治疗的患者更可能为女性且拥有私人保险,但出现心脏阳性标志物或ST段压低的可能性较小。在调整分析中,接受DES治疗的患者死亡和再发梗死显著降低,但早期血管重建术和指南推荐治疗的频率较低。在多变量模型中,DES使用的显著(p<0.05)预测因素包括高脂血症、收缩压升高、私人保险以及在较大医院接受治疗。总之,这些发现不仅确定了接受裸金属支架与DES治疗患者在选择和治疗上的差异,还表明DES在先前被排除在随机关键试验之外的高危患者中的使用不断增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验