Brouwers Adrienne H, Mulders Peter F A, de Mulder Pieter H M, van den Broek Wim J M, Buijs Wilhelmina C A M, Mala Carola, Joosten Frank B M, Oosterwijk Egbert, Boerman Otto C, Corstens Frans H M, Oyen Wim J G
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 20;23(27):6540-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.732.
A previous activity dose-escalation study using 131I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody cG250 in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) resulted in occasional therapeutic responses. The present study was designed to determine the safety and therapeutic efficacy of two sequential high-dose treatments with 131I-cG250.
Patients (n = 29) with progressive metastatic RCC received a low dose of (131)I-cG250 for assessment of preferential targeting of metastatic lesions, followed by the first radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 2220 MBq/m2 131I-cG250 (n = 27) 1 week later. If no grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed, a second low-dose 131I-cG250 (n = 20) was given 3 months later. When blood clearance was not accelerated, a second RIT of 131I-cG250 was administered at an activity-dose of 1110 MBq/m2 (n = 3) or 1665 MBq/m2 (n = 16). Patients were monitored weekly for toxicity, and tumor size was evaluated by computed tomography once every 3 months intervals.
The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of the second RIT was 1,665 MBq/m2 because of dose-limiting hematological toxicity. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, after two RIT treatments, the disease stabilized in five of 29 patients, whereas it remained progressive in 14 of 29 patients. Two patients received no RIT, and eight of 29 received only one 131I-cG250 RIT because of grade 4 hematologic toxicity, formation of human antichimeric antibodies, or disease progression.
In patients with progressive end-stage RCC, the MTD of the second treatment was 75% of the MTD of the first RIT. In the majority of patients, two cycles of 131I-cG250 could be safely administered without severe toxicity. No objective responses were observed, but occasionally two RIT doses resulted in stabilization of previously progressive disease.
先前一项在进展期转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者中使用131I标记的嵌合单克隆抗体cG250进行的活性剂量递增研究偶尔产生了治疗反应。本研究旨在确定131I-cG250连续两次高剂量治疗的安全性和治疗效果。
进展期转移性RCC患者(n = 29)接受低剂量的(131)I-cG250以评估转移病灶的优先靶向情况,1周后接受首次放射免疫治疗(RIT),使用2220 MBq/m2的131I-cG250(n = 27)。如果未观察到4级血液学毒性,3个月后给予第二次低剂量131I-cG250(n = 20)。当血液清除未加速时,以1110 MBq/m2(n = 3)或1665 MBq/m2(n = 16)的活性剂量给予第二次131I-cG250 RIT。每周监测患者的毒性反应,每3个月通过计算机断层扫描评估肿瘤大小。
由于剂量限制性血液学毒性,第二次RIT的最大耐受剂量(MTD)为1665 MBq/m2。基于意向性分析,两次RIT治疗后,29例患者中有5例疾病稳定,而29例患者中有14例疾病仍进展。2例患者未接受RIT,29例中有8例因4级血液学毒性、人抗嵌合抗体形成或疾病进展仅接受了一次131I-cG250 RIT。
在进展期晚期RCC患者中,第二次治疗的MTD为首次RIT MTD的75%。在大多数患者中,可以安全地给予两个周期的131I-cG250而无严重毒性。未观察到客观反应,但偶尔两次RIT剂量可使先前进展的疾病稳定。