Divgi Chaitanya R, O'Donoghue Joseph A, Welt Sydney, O'Neel Jayne, Finn Ron, Motzer Robert J, Jungbluth Achim, Hoffman Eric, Ritter Gerd, Larson Steve M, Old Lloyd J
Nuclear Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
J Nucl Med. 2004 Aug;45(8):1412-21.
This trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated whole-body radiation-absorbed dose of fractionated (131)I-cG250.
This was a phase 1 dose escalation trial. Dose escalation refers here to the escalation of average whole-body absorbed dose. Fifteen patients with measurable metastatic renal cancer were studied. For each treatment cycle, patients initially received a "scout" administration consisting of 5 mg of cG250 antibody labeled with 185 MBq (5 mCi) of (131)I. Whole-body and serum activity was measured for 1 wk, and a simple pharmacokinetic model was fitted to the measured data. The pharmacokinetic model was used to calculate the required activities, administered in a fractionated pattern with 2-3 d between fractions, projected to deliver the prescribed whole-body absorbed dose. The initial cohort of 3 patients was prescribed an average whole-body absorbed dose of 0.50 Gy. In subsequent cohorts this was increased in 0.25-Gy increments. The first fraction in each cycle was 1,110 MBq (30 mCi) of (131)I conjugated to 5 mg of antibody. Subsequent fractions consisted of variable activities depending on the patient-specific whole-body clearance rates and the times between fractions. Patients without evidence of disease progression were retreated after recovery from toxicity if there was no evidence of altered pharmacokinetics or serum human antichimeric antibody titers, for a total of no more than 3 treatments.
For the initial treatment course, the pharmacokinetics of the scout dose accurately predicted the pharmacokinetics of fractionated (131)I-cG250 therapy. In 2 patients, altered clearance accurately predicted development of human antichimeric antibody. Targeting to known disease >or= 2 cm in diameter was noted in all patients. Dose-limiting toxicity was hematopoietic, and the maximum tolerated dose per cycle was 0.75 Gy.
Measurements of whole-body and serum clearance of cG250 antibody can be used to accurately predict the clearance of subsequent administrations, thus enabling rational treatment planning. An additional practical benefit of real-time pharmacokinetic monitoring is that therapy can be altered dynamically to reduce toxic side effects. However, there was no evidence for fractionation-induced sparing of the hematopoietic system in this study.
进行该试验以确定分次给予(131)I-cG250时的最大耐受全身辐射吸收剂量。
这是一项1期剂量递增试验。此处的剂量递增是指平均全身吸收剂量的递增。研究了15例可测量的转移性肾癌患者。在每个治疗周期中,患者最初接受一次“预试验”给药,包括5mg用185MBq(5mCi)(131)I标记的cG250抗体。测量1周内的全身和血清活性,并对测量数据拟合一个简单的药代动力学模型。药代动力学模型用于计算所需的活度,以分次给药的方式给药,每次给药间隔2 - 3天,预计可达到规定的全身吸收剂量。最初的3例患者队列被规定平均全身吸收剂量为0.50Gy。在随后的队列中,该剂量以0.25Gy的增量增加。每个周期的首次给药为1110MBq(30mCi)与5mg抗体结合的(131)I。随后的给药剂量根据患者特定的全身清除率和给药间隔时间而有所不同。如果没有药代动力学改变或血清人抗嵌合抗体滴度改变的证据,且无疾病进展证据的患者在从毒性中恢复后可再次接受治疗,但总共不超过3次治疗。
在初始治疗过程中,预试验剂量的药代动力学准确预测了分次给予(131)I-cG250治疗的药代动力学。在2例患者中,清除率改变准确预测了人抗嵌合抗体的产生。所有患者均观察到对直径≥2cm的已知病灶的靶向作用。剂量限制性毒性为血液学毒性,每个周期的最大耐受剂量为0.75Gy。
测量cG250抗体的全身和血清清除率可用于准确预测后续给药的清除率,从而实现合理的治疗计划。实时药代动力学监测的另一个实际益处是可动态调整治疗以减少毒副作用。然而,本研究中没有证据表明分次给药可使造血系统免受辐射。