Suppr超能文献

抗精神病药物对慢性精神分裂症患者的疗效。

Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

作者信息

Lieberman Jeffrey A, Stroup T Scott, McEvoy Joseph P, Swartz Marvin S, Rosenheck Robert A, Perkins Diana O, Keefe Richard S E, Davis Sonia M, Davis Clarence E, Lebowitz Barry D, Severe Joanne, Hsiao John K

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1209-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688. Epub 2005 Sep 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relative effectiveness of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs as compared with that of older agents has been incompletely addressed, though newer agents are currently used far more commonly. We compared a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, with several newer drugs in a double-blind study.

METHODS

A total of 1493 patients with schizophrenia were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (7.5 to 30 mg per day), perphenazine (8 to 32 mg per day), quetiapine (200 to 800 mg per day), or risperidone (1.5 to 6.0 mg per day) for up to 18 months. Ziprasidone (40 to 160 mg per day) was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary aim was to delineate differences in the overall effectiveness of these five treatments.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 percent of patients discontinued the study medication before 18 months (1061 of the 1432 patients who received at least one dose): 64 percent of those assigned to olanzapine, 75 percent of those assigned to perphenazine, 82 percent of those assigned to quetiapine, 74 percent of those assigned to risperidone, and 79 percent of those assigned to ziprasidone. The time to the discontinuation of treatment for any cause was significantly longer in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (P<0.001) or risperidone (P=0.002) group, but not in the perphenazine (P=0.021) or ziprasidone (P=0.028) group. The times to discontinuation because of intolerable side effects were similar among the groups, but the rates differed (P=0.04); olanzapine was associated with more discontinuation for weight gain or metabolic effects, and perphenazine was associated with more discontinuation for extrapyramidal effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients in each group discontinued their assigned treatment owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects or for other reasons. Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain and increases in measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.

摘要

背景

尽管第二代(非典型)抗精神病药物目前使用更为普遍,但与 older agents 相比,其相对有效性尚未得到充分研究。我们在一项双盲研究中比较了第一代抗精神病药物奋乃静与几种 newer drugs。

方法

在美国 57 个地点招募了 1493 例精神分裂症患者,随机分配接受奥氮平(每天 7.5 至 30 毫克)、奋乃静(每天 8 至 32 毫克)、喹硫平(每天 200 至 800 毫克)或利培酮(每天 1.5 至 6.0 毫克)治疗长达 18 个月。齐拉西酮(每天 40 至 160 毫克)在获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准后纳入研究。主要目的是明确这五种治疗方法在总体有效性上的差异。

结果

总体而言,74%的患者在 18 个月前停止使用研究药物(1432 例接受至少一剂药物治疗的患者中有 1061 例):分配接受奥氮平治疗的患者中有 64%,分配接受奋乃静治疗的患者中有 75%,分配接受喹硫平治疗的患者中有 82%,分配接受利培酮治疗的患者中有 74%,分配接受齐拉西酮治疗的患者中有 79%。奥氮平组因任何原因停止治疗的时间显著长于喹硫平组(P<0.001)或利培酮组(P=0.002),但与奋乃静组(P=0.021)或齐拉西酮组(P=0.028)相比无显著差异。因无法耐受的副作用而停药的时间在各组之间相似,但停药率不同(P=0.04);奥氮平与因体重增加或代谢影响而停药的情况较多相关,奋乃静与因锥体外系反应而停药的情况较多相关。

结论

每组中的大多数患者由于无效、无法耐受的副作用或其他原因停止了分配的治疗。就停药率而言,奥氮平最有效,传统抗精神病药物奋乃静的疗效似乎与喹硫平、利培酮和齐拉西酮相似。奥氮平与体重增加以及血糖和脂质代谢指标升高相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验