Keefe Richard S E, Bilder Robert M, Davis Sonia M, Harvey Philip D, Palmer Barton W, Gold James M, Meltzer Herbert Y, Green Michael F, Capuano George, Stroup T Scott, McEvoy Joseph P, Swartz Marvin S, Rosenheck Robert A, Perkins Diana O, Davis Clarence E, Hsiao John K, Lieberman Jeffrey A
Department of Psychiatry, John Umstead Hospital, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;64(6):633-47. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.633.
Neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia is severe and is an important predictor of functional outcome. The relative effect of the second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs and older agents on neurocognition has not been comprehensively determined.
To compare the neurocognitive effects of several second-generation antipsychotics and a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine.
Randomized, double-blind study of patients with schizophrenia assigned to receive treatment with olanzapine, perphenazine, quetiapine fumarate, or risperidone for up to 18 months as reported previously by Lieberman et al. Ziprasidone hydrochloride was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration.
Fifty-seven sites participated, including academic sites and treatment mental health facilities representative of the community.
From a cohort of 1460 patients in the treatment study, 817 completed neurocognitive testing immediately prior to randomization and then after 2 months of treatment.
The primary outcome was change in a neurocognitive composite score after 2 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes included neurocognitive composite score change at 6 months and 18 months after continued treatment and changes in neurocognitive domains.
At 2 months, treatment resulted in small neurocognitive improvements of z = 0.13 for olanzapine (P<.002), 0.25 for perphenazine (P<.001), 0.18 for quetiapine (P<.001), 0.26 for risperidone (P<.001), and 0.12 for ziprasidone (P<.06), with no significant differences between groups. Results at 6 months were similar. After 18 months of treatment, neurocognitive improvement was greater in the perphenazine group than in the olanzapine and risperidone groups. Neurocognitive improvement predicted longer time to treatment discontinuation, independently from symptom improvement, in patients treated with quetiapine or ziprasidone.
After 2 months of antipsychotic treatment, all groups had a small but significant improvement in neurocognition. There were no differences between any pair of agents, including the typical drug perphenazine. These results differ from the majority of previous studies, and the possible reasons are discussed.
精神分裂症中的神经认知损害严重,且是功能转归的重要预测指标。第二代(非典型)抗精神病药物和 older agents 对神经认知的相对影响尚未得到全面确定。
比较几种第二代抗精神病药物和第一代抗精神病药物奋乃静对神经认知的影响。
如 Lieberman 等人先前报道,对精神分裂症患者进行随机、双盲研究,患者被分配接受奥氮平、奋乃静、富马酸喹硫平或利培酮治疗长达 18 个月。盐酸齐拉西酮在获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准后被纳入研究。
57 个地点参与研究,包括学术机构和具有社区代表性的治疗性心理健康机构。
在治疗研究的 1460 名患者队列中,817 名患者在随机分组前以及治疗 2 个月后立即完成了神经认知测试。
主要结局是治疗 2 个月后神经认知综合评分的变化。次要结局包括持续治疗 6 个月和 18 个月后神经认知综合评分的变化以及神经认知领域的变化。
在 2 个月时,治疗使奥氮平组神经认知有小幅改善,z = 0.13(P <.002),奋乃静组为 0.25(P <.001),喹硫平组为 0.18(P <.001),利培酮组为 0.26(P <.001),齐拉西酮组为 0.12(P <.06),组间无显著差异。6 个月时的结果相似。治疗 18 个月后,奋乃静组的神经认知改善大于奥氮平和利培酮组。在接受喹硫平或齐拉西酮治疗的患者中,神经认知改善可预测治疗停药时间延长,且独立于症状改善情况。
抗精神病药物治疗 2 个月后,所有组的神经认知均有小幅但显著的改善。任何两种药物之间均无差异,包括典型药物奋乃静。这些结果与大多数先前研究不同,并对可能的原因进行了讨论。