Suppr超能文献

使用Carisolv去除乳牙牙本质龋:一项随机、对照、前瞻性研究,随访6个月,比较化学机械治疗与钻孔治疗。

Removing dentine caries in deciduous teeth with Carisolv: a randomised, controlled, prospective study with six-month follow-up, comparing chemomechanical treatment with drilling.

作者信息

Bergmann Jørgen, Leitão Jorge, Kultje Christina, Bergmann Dorte, Clode Maria João

机构信息

Ryslinge-Orbaek Community Dental Clinic, Orbaek Fyn, Denmark.

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2005;3(2):105-11.

Abstract

Dental fear is often associated with experience of pain, unpleasant sounds and uncomfortable vibrations caused by dental drills. Therefore patients welcome alternative, less painful excavating methods such as lasers, sandblasters and chemomechanical systems. The aim of this study was to compare a chemomechanical caries removal system (Carisolv) to traditional drilling with regard to patient acceptance and time consumption as well as the six-month success rate of fillings. Ninety-two primary teeth in 46 children were included in the study. From this study, the following conclusions can be drawn: patient acceptance of Carisolv-treatment compared to drilling is excellent, since 65% would choose Carisolv and no one drilling when treated next time. The dentists rated patients' degree of pain significantly lower in Carisolv situations than in drill situations. Time consumption is significantly higher when excavating with Carisolv (6.7 min.) than with drill (3.3 min.). The durability of fillings six months after treatment is equal in the two groups.

摘要

牙科恐惧通常与疼痛经历、牙科钻引起的 unpleasant 声音和不舒服的震动有关。因此,患者欢迎替代的、疼痛感较轻的龋洞挖掘方法,如激光、喷砂器和化学机械系统。本研究的目的是比较一种化学机械性龋洞去除系统(Carisolv)与传统钻牙在患者接受度、耗时以及补牙六个月成功率方面的差异。46名儿童的92颗乳牙被纳入该研究。从这项研究中,可以得出以下结论:与钻牙相比,患者对Carisolv治疗的接受度极佳,因为65%的患者下次治疗时会选择Carisolv,而无人选择钻牙。牙医评定患者在使用Carisolv时的疼痛程度明显低于钻牙时。使用Carisolv挖掘龋洞时的耗时(6.7分钟)明显高于钻牙时(3.3分钟)。治疗六个月后两组补牙的耐用性相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验