• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳牙化学机械去龋的临床评估及其在患者中的接受度。

Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients.

作者信息

Maragakis G M, Hahn P, Hellwig E

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Freiburg School of Dentistry, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Caries Res. 2001 May-Jun;35(3):205-10. doi: 10.1159/000047457.

DOI:10.1159/000047457
PMID:11385201
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficiency and patient acceptance of the chemomechanical caries removal agent Carisolvtrade mark in deciduous teeth. Contralateral primary molars of sixteen 7- to 9-year-old patients (32 teeth) were treated with the air-motor and with Carisolv, respectively. Patients replied to a pre- and a postoperative questionnaire. Complete caries removal (CCR) was accomplished in all air-motor sessions. It was not achieved within the time limit of 15 min in 6 (37.5%) Carisolv sessions. Air-motor CCR time ranged between 6 and 18 s (mean: 11.81 s ). Carisolv CCR time, where accomplished within 15 min, ranged between 6 min 46 s and 13 min 57 s (mean: 6 min 51 s). Preoperatively, the majority of the children reported disliking the drilling, and that they would visit the dentist more often and prefer sitting in the chair longer if they could avoid it. Postoperatively, the majority of the children reported disliking the taste of Carisolv, estimated Carisolv to have taken longer, would not recommend it to their friends, and preferred the air-motor. In conclusion, Carisolv, although a step forward in terms of solution volume required, is not in a position to replace rotary instruments for caries removal: it did not remove decay completely in one third of our sample; it was much slower than the air-motor; it had a chlorine taste/odor our patients disliked.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估化学机械去龋剂Carisolv在乳牙治疗中的临床效果及患者接受度。16名7至9岁患者(共32颗牙)的对侧乳磨牙分别采用气动马达和Carisolv进行治疗。患者在术前和术后回答了问卷。所有气动马达治疗均实现了完全去龋(CCR)。在6次(37.5%)Carisolv治疗中,未在15分钟的时间限制内完成完全去龋。气动马达的CCR时间在6至18秒之间(平均:11.81秒)。在15分钟内完成的Carisolv的CCR时间在6分46秒至13分57秒之间(平均:6分51秒)。术前,大多数儿童表示不喜欢钻孔,并且如果可以避免,他们会更频繁地看牙医,并且更喜欢在椅子上多坐一会儿。术后,大多数儿童表示不喜欢Carisolv的味道,认为Carisolv用时更长,不会向朋友推荐它,并且更喜欢气动马达。总之,Carisolv虽然在所需溶液量方面向前迈进了一步,但无法替代旋转器械进行去龋:在我们三分之一的样本中,它未能完全去除龋坏;它比气动马达慢得多;它有我们患者不喜欢的氯味/氯气味。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients.乳牙化学机械去龋的临床评估及其在患者中的接受度。
Caries Res. 2001 May-Jun;35(3):205-10. doi: 10.1159/000047457.
2
Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv).化学机械去龋(Carisolv)的临床随机对照试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006 May;16(3):161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00719.x.
3
Clinical evaluation of chemomechanical and mechanical caries removal: status of the restorations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.化学机械法与机械法去除龋坏组织的临床评估:修复体在3、6、9和12个月时的状况
Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Mar;11(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0072-1. Epub 2006 Sep 13.
4
Removing dentine caries in deciduous teeth with Carisolv: a randomised, controlled, prospective study with six-month follow-up, comparing chemomechanical treatment with drilling.使用Carisolv去除乳牙牙本质龋:一项随机、对照、前瞻性研究,随访6个月,比较化学机械治疗与钻孔治疗。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2005;3(2):105-11.
5
Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial.使用Carisolv化学机械法去除乳牙龋齿:一项临床试验。
Pediatr Dent. 2004 Jan-Feb;26(1):23-8.
6
A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method.关于伢典龋齿去腐方法的一项对比临床研究。
Quintessence Int. 2003 Apr;34(4):269-71.
7
How to make choice of the carious removal methods, Carisolv or traditional drilling? A meta-analysis.如何选择龋病去除方法,生物酶去腐法还是传统钻牙法?一项荟萃分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Jun;41(6):432-42. doi: 10.1111/joor.12161. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
8
Clinical evaluation of a chemomechanical method for caries removal in children and adolescents.临床评价一种用于儿童和青少年龋病去除的化学机械方法。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(5):277-83. doi: 10.1080/00016350902976779.
9
Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system.根据部位/阶段概念(一种修订的龋病分类系统)对Carisolv化学机械去龋技术进行临床评估。
Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Mar;7(1):32-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0196-5. Epub 2003 Feb 20.
10
Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Carisolv系统与传统旋转器械用于乳牙龋齿去除的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73(8):569-80. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1023353. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of Papacarie and Carisolv in effective chemomechanical carious dentin removal in primary teeth: A systematic review.Papacarie与Carisolv用于乳牙有效化学机械性龋坏牙本质去除的比较评价:一项系统评价
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Aug 25;22:33. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_205_23. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical performance of two chemomechanical caries removal agents in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.两种化学机械去龋剂在乳牙中的临床性能:一项随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01030-9.
3
Efficacy of chemo-mechanical caries removal: a 24-month randomized trial.
化学机械去龋的疗效:一项为期24个月的随机试验。
Front Oral Health. 2024 Dec 3;5:1458530. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1458530. eCollection 2024.
4
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.治疗龋坏或牙本质龋损的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2.
5
BRIX3000® Papain Gel for Cavity Treatment in the Adult Patient.BRIX3000®木瓜蛋白酶凝胶用于成人患者的龋齿治疗。
Case Rep Dent. 2021 Jun 12;2021:6624825. doi: 10.1155/2021/6624825. eCollection 2021.
6
A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carie-Care gel for permanent teeth of children of age group of 12-15 years with that of conventional drilling method: A randomized controlled trial.12至15岁儿童恒牙使用龋齿关爱凝胶进行化学机械去龋与传统钻孔方法临床效果的比较研究:一项随机对照试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):42-46.
7
New treatment method for pain and reduction of local anesthesia use in deep caries.深龋疼痛治疗及局部麻醉使用减少的新方法
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;18(5):277-285. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.5.277. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
8
Effect of a Papain-based Chemomechanical Agent on Structure of Dentin and Bond Strength: An Study.一种基于木瓜蛋白酶的化学机械剂对牙本质结构和粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):161-166. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1504. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
Chemomechanical caries removal method versus mechanical caries removal methods in clinical and community-based setting: A comparative in vivo study.临床及社区环境下化学机械去龋法与机械去龋法的比较:一项体内对照研究
Eur J Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):386-391. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.184151.
10
Caries Removal by Chemomechanical (Carisolv™) vs. Rotary Drill: A Systematic Review.化学机械法(Carisolv™)与旋转牙钻去龋的系统评价
Open Dent J. 2015 Dec 31;9:462-72. doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010462. eCollection 2015.