• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢吡肟与舒巴坦/头孢哌酮治疗儿童中重度呼吸道感染的疗效观察

[Therapeutic effects of cefepime and sulbactam/cefoperazone on moderate and severe respiratory tract infection in children].

作者信息

Huang Jian-jun, Zeng Qiang, Yu Jia-lu

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Children's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.

出版信息

Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2005 Sep;25(9):1199-200.

PMID:16174597
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic effects and safety of cefepime (Maxipime) and sulbactam/cefoperazone (sulperazone) on moderate and severe respiratory infection in children.

METHODS

Totally 100 children hospitalized for pneumonia were randomized equally into 2 groups, namely group A with maxipime treatment at the dose of 50 mg/kg given intravenously twice daily, and group B with sulperazone treatment at 50-100 mg/kg given intravenously twice a day. The therapeutic effects and safety of both medications were observed.

RESULTS

In maxipime group, 44 of the 50 cases were cured with complete elimination of the symptoms and signs, and obvious therapeutic effect was achieved in 5 cases with significant improvement or resolution of the majority of symptoms and signs. One case failed to respond favorably to the treatment, with the overall efficacy rate of 98% without incidence of adverse effects. In sulperazone group, 40 of the 50 cases were cured, 6 showed significant improvement, and 4 failed to respond to the treatment, with the rate of 92%. One patient complained of rashes during sulperazone treatment, which disappeared the next day without sulperazone withdrawal. Significant difference was not noted between the groups (chi(2)=2.43, P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both maxipime and sulperazon are effective and safe for application in children with moderate and severe respiratory infections.

摘要

目的

评估头孢吡肟(马斯平)与舒巴坦/头孢哌酮(舒普深)治疗儿童中重度呼吸道感染的疗效及安全性。

方法

将100例因肺炎住院的儿童随机均分为2组,即A组采用马斯平治疗,剂量为50mg/kg,静脉滴注,每日2次;B组采用舒普深治疗,剂量为50 - 100mg/kg,静脉滴注,每日2次。观察两种药物的疗效及安全性。

结果

马斯平组50例中,44例症状体征完全消失治愈,5例症状体征大部分明显改善或消失,显效,1例治疗无效,总有效率98%,无不良反应发生。舒普深组50例中,40例治愈,6例显效,4例无效,有效率92%。1例在舒普深治疗期间出现皮疹,次日自行消退,未停药。两组间差异无统计学意义(χ² = 2.43,P > 0.05)。

结论

马斯平和舒普深治疗儿童中重度呼吸道感染均安全有效。

相似文献

1
[Therapeutic effects of cefepime and sulbactam/cefoperazone on moderate and severe respiratory tract infection in children].头孢吡肟与舒巴坦/头孢哌酮治疗儿童中重度呼吸道感染的疗效观察
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2005 Sep;25(9):1199-200.
2
[Sulperazone in the treatment of severe infections in patients with cancer].舒普深用于治疗癌症患者的严重感染
Antibiot Khimioter. 2003;48(3):26-9.
3
Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam versus Cefepime in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦与头孢吡肟治疗医院获得性和医疗相关性肺炎的随机非劣效性试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jul 25;63(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00023-19. Print 2019 Aug.
4
[A randomized clinical study of sulperazone versus tienam in the treatment of LRTIS].
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1996 Dec;35(12):819-23.
5
Cefepime vs. cefoperazone/sulbactam in combination with amikacin as empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenia.头孢吡肟与头孢哌酮/舒巴坦联合阿米卡星作为发热性中性粒细胞减少症的经验性抗生素治疗。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov;26(11):3899-3908. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4260-8. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Cefoperazone-sulbactam for treatment of intra-abdominal infections: results from a randomized, parallel group study in India.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦治疗腹腔内感染:印度一项随机平行组研究的结果
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Jun;9(3):367-76. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.013.
7
Sulbactam/cefoperazone versus cefotaxime for the treatment of moderate-to-severe bacterial infections: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.舒巴坦/头孢哌酮与头孢噻肟治疗中重度细菌感染:一项随机对照临床试验的结果
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Mar;24(3):498-505. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.498.
8
[Comparative clinical and epidemiological evaluation of beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of intraabdominal infections].β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗腹腔内感染的比较临床和流行病学评估
Antibiot Khimioter. 2003;48(3):34-41.
9
[Clinical experience with the treatment of severe nosocomial infections by inhibitor-protected 3rd generation cephalosporin cefoperazone/sulbactam].[应用抑制剂保护的第三代头孢菌素头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗严重医院感染的临床经验]
Antibiot Khimioter. 2005;50(4):33-40.
10
[Efficacy and safety of cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of children with mucoviscidosis during exacerbation of the bronchopulmonary process].
Antibiot Khimioter. 2003;48(12):18-21.