Thornton Allen E, Van Snellenberg Jared X, Sepehry Amir A, Honer William
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6.
J Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;20(3):335-46. doi: 10.1177/0269881105057002. Epub 2005 Sep 20.
This meta-analytic review examines the efficacy of antipsychotic medications in ameliorating schizophrenia-related long-term memory (LTM) impairments. Twenty-three studies were reviewed that compared schizophrenia spectrum patients treated (a) with atypical versus typical antipsychotic medications, or (b) with various atypical treatments. In 17 atypical versus typical trials aggregating 939 participants, superior overall (verbal and nonverbal) LTM was detected in patients assigned to atypical trials. However, this difference was small (effect size estimate (ES) 0.17; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.31) and specific to certain atypical treatments. Relative to typical antipsychotic trials, LTM superiority was marginally significant for risperidone trials (ES 0.20; 95% CI -0.03 to 0.44) and significant for olanzapine trials (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.49). In contrast, clozapine trials did not produce a LTM advantage over typical trials (ES -0.06; 95% CI -0.35 to 0.23). Due to the lack of available studies, the effect of quetiapine was indeterminate. Direct comparison between atypical trials revealed a similar effect pattern. A marginally significant superiority in overall LTM was detected for risperidone and olanzapine compared to clozapine (ES 0.28; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.59), which reached significance for verbal LTM (ES 0.36; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.67). Finally, the beneficial impact of antipsychotic medications emerged as a function of differences in the anticholinergic properties of the treatment arms being compared.
本荟萃分析综述考察了抗精神病药物在改善精神分裂症相关长期记忆(LTM)损害方面的疗效。共回顾了23项研究,这些研究比较了接受以下治疗的精神分裂症谱系患者:(a)非典型抗精神病药物与典型抗精神病药物;或(b)各种非典型治疗方法。在17项非典型与典型药物对比试验中,共有939名参与者,结果发现分配到非典型药物试验组的患者在总体(言语和非言语)长期记忆方面表现更优。然而,这种差异较小(效应量估计值(ES)为0.17;95%置信区间(CI)为0.04至0.31),且仅特定于某些非典型治疗方法。相对于典型抗精神病药物试验,利培酮试验的长期记忆优势接近显著(ES为0.20;95%CI为-0.03至0.44),奥氮平试验则显著(ES为0.29;95%CI为0.08至0.49)。相比之下,氯氮平试验并未显示出比典型药物试验更具长期记忆优势(ES为-0.06;95%CI为-0.35至0.23)。由于缺乏可用研究,喹硫平的效果尚不确定。非典型药物试验之间的直接比较显示出类似的效应模式。与氯氮平相比,利培酮和奥氮平在总体长期记忆方面有接近显著的优势(ES为0.28;95%CI为-0.04至0.59),在言语长期记忆方面达到显著水平(ES为0.36;95%CI为0.04至0.67)。最后,抗精神病药物的有益影响表现为所比较治疗组抗胆碱能特性差异的函数。