Suppr超能文献

用于侵袭性曲霉病诊断的聚合酶链反应-酶联免疫吸附测定法(PCR-ELISA)与半乳甘露聚糖检测的比较

Comparison of PCR-ELISA and galactomannan detection for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.

作者信息

Scotter Jennifer M, Campbell Peter, Anderson Trevor P, Murdoch David R, Chambers Stephen T, Patton W Nigel

机构信息

Microbiology Unit, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Pathology. 2005 Jun;37(3):246-53. doi: 10.1080/00313020500099148.

Abstract

AIM

To compare PCR with galactomannan antigen detection for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA).

METHODS

We prospectively collected serial blood samples from haematological patients at risk of IA, and analysed their samples retrospectively for galactomannan (GM) antigen using the Platelia test and for aspergillus DNA using an in-house PCR-ELISA assay. Matched GM and PCR analyses were performed on 263 samples from 25 patients. Patients were classified for potential IA according to international consensus criteria, with five patients classified as positive (four proven, one probable) and 20 classified as negative (seven possible, 13 no evidence IA).

RESULTS

All five patients with IA were positive by PCR with positive results in 24 of 82 samples, whereas three of five patients were positive by GM with four of 82 samples being positive. Three of 20 patients without IA were positive by PCR in 18 of 181 samples, whereas corresponding results for GM detection were one of 20 and one of 181, respectively. Adjustment of ELISA cut-off values and/or the requirement for two consecutive samples to be positive generated different results; however, lowering the positivity index (PI) for GM detection to 0.5 did not improve the sensitivity of the assay. Optimal results for PCR detection and GM were: 100% and 60% sensitivity, 85% and 95% specificity, 0.625 and 0.75 positive predictive value, and 1.0 and 0.8 negative predictive value, with a false-positive sample rate of 8 and 0.4%, positive likelihood ratio of 6.66 and 11.99 and negative likelihood ratio of 0 and 0.42, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This PCR method is very sensitive for the diagnosis of IA but is associated with a moderate rate of false positives; the GM assay exhibited poor sensitivity but high specificity. Further evaluation of PCR assays for the diagnosis of IA and other invasive fungal infections is warranted.

摘要

目的

比较聚合酶链反应(PCR)与半乳甘露聚糖抗原检测用于诊断侵袭性曲霉病(IA)的效果。

方法

我们前瞻性地收集了有IA风险的血液病患者的系列血样,并回顾性地使用普立泰检测法分析其样本中的半乳甘露聚糖(GM)抗原,同时使用内部PCR-ELISA检测法分析曲霉DNA。对来自25名患者的263份样本进行了GM和PCR的匹配分析。根据国际共识标准对患者潜在的IA进行分类,5名患者被分类为阳性(4例确诊,1例可能),20名患者被分类为阴性(7例可能,13例无IA证据)。

结果

所有5例IA患者的PCR检测均为阳性,82份样本中有24份结果呈阳性,而5例患者中有3例GM检测呈阳性,82份样本中有4份呈阳性。20例无IA的患者中有3例PCR检测呈阳性,181份样本中有18份呈阳性,而GM检测的相应结果分别为20例中的1例和181例中的1例。调整ELISA临界值和/或要求连续两个样本呈阳性会产生不同结果;然而,将GM检测的阳性指数(PI)降至0.5并未提高检测的灵敏度。PCR检测和GM的最佳结果为:灵敏度分别为100%和60%,特异性分别为85%和95%,阳性预测值分别为0.625和0.75,阴性预测值分别为1.0和~0.8,假阳性样本率分别为8%和0.4%,阳性似然比分别为6.66和11.99,阴性似然比分别为0和0.42。

结论

这种PCR方法对IA的诊断非常敏感,但假阳性率适中;GM检测灵敏度较差但特异性高。有必要进一步评估PCR检测法在IA和其他侵袭性真菌感染诊断中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验