Jones Alvin
Walter Reed Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
J Pers Disord. 2005 Aug;19(4):370-85. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.370.
Three sets of personality disorder scales (PD scales) can be scored for the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989). Two sets (Levitt & Gotts, 1995; Morey, Waugh, & Blashfield, 1985) are derived from the MMPI (Hathaway & McKinley, 1983), and a third set (Somwaru & Ben-Porath, 1995) is based on the MMPI-2. There is no validity research for the Levitt and Gotts scale, and limited validity research is available for the Somwaru and Ben-Porath scales. There is a large body of research suggesting that the Morey et al. scales have good to excellent convergent validity when compared to a variety of other measures of personality disorders. Since the Morey et al. scales have established validity, there is a question if additional sets of PD scales are needed. The primary purpose of this research was to determine if the PD scales developed by Levitt and Gotts and those developed by Somwaru and Ben-Porath contribute incrementally to the scales developed by Morey et al. in predicting corresponding scales on the MCMI-II (Millon, 1987). In a sample of 494 individuals evaluated at an Army medical center, a hierarchical regression analysis demonstrated that the Somwaru and Ben-Porath Borderline, Antisocial, and Schizoid PD scales and the Levitt and Gotts Narcissistic and Histrionic scales contributed significantly and meaningfully to the Morey et al. scales in predicting the corresponding MCMI-II (Millon, 1987) scale. However, only the Somwaru and Ben-Porath scales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and convergent validity.
明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版（MMPI - 2；Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989）可以对三套人格障碍量表（PD量表）进行计分。其中两套（Levitt & Gotts, 1995；Morey, Waugh, & Blashfield, 1985）源自明尼苏达多相人格测验（MMPI；Hathaway & McKinley, 1983），第三套（Somwaru & Ben - Porath, 1995）则基于MMPI - 2。对于Levitt和Gotts量表，目前尚无效度研究，而关于Somwaru和Ben - Porath量表的效度研究也较为有限。有大量研究表明，与其他多种人格障碍测量方法相比，Morey等人编制的量表具有良好到极佳的聚合效度。鉴于Morey等人编制的量表已确立了效度，那么是否还需要额外的PD量表集就成了一个问题。本研究的主要目的是确定Levitt和Gotts编制的PD量表以及Somwaru和Ben - Porath编制的PD量表，在预测米隆临床多轴量表第二版（MCMI - II；Millon, 1987）上的相应量表时，是否能在Morey等人编制的量表基础上提供额外的预测价值。在一家陆军医疗中心接受评估的494名个体样本中，分层回归分析表明，Somwaru和Ben - Porath编制的边缘型、反社会型和分裂样PD量表，以及Levitt和Gotts编制的自恋型和表演型量表，在预测相应的MCMI - II（Millon, 1987）量表时，对Morey等人编制的量表有显著且有意义的贡献。然而，只有Somwaru和Ben - Porath编制的量表显示出可接受的内部一致性和聚合效度。
