Schuler C E, Snibbe J R, Buckwalter J G
Andrus Gerontology Center, University of Southern California.
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Mar;50(2):220-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199403)50:2<220::aid-jclp2270500211>3.0.co;2-j.
The MMPI Personality Disorder scales, developed by Morey, Waugh, and Blashfield (1985), were validated on an inpatient population by comparing 104 patients' MMPI-PD scores with the MCMI and with DSM-III-R diagnosis. Conservative significance levels were used to ensure more valid conclusions. Schizoid, Avoidant, Dependent, Histrionic, and Narcissistic scales were correlated significantly. Passive-Aggressive, Schizotypal, and Borderline scales did not correlate with corresponding MCMI scales. The MMPI-PD nonoverlapping scales were most effective in predicting diagnosis, specifically the Personality Disorder NOS, Eccentric and Borderline groups. The overlapping scales were not as effective in predicting diagnosis, but best predicted the Eccentric and Borderline groups. This study provides support for the validity of specific scales and circumscribed diagnostic utility for both measures.
莫雷、沃和布拉什菲尔德(1985年)编制的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)人格障碍量表,通过将104名患者的MMPI - PD分数与米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM - III - R)诊断结果相比较,在住院患者群体中得到了验证。采用了保守的显著性水平以确保得出更有效的结论。分裂样、回避型、依赖型、表演型和自恋型量表有显著相关性。被动攻击型、分裂型和边缘型量表与相应的MCMI量表无相关性。MMPI - PD非重叠量表在预测诊断方面最为有效,特别是对未特定的人格障碍、古怪型和边缘型群体。重叠量表在预测诊断方面效果不佳,但对古怪型和边缘型群体的预测最佳。本研究为特定量表的有效性及两种测量方法的限定性诊断效用提供了支持。