Bardella Inis Jane, Janosky Janine, Elnicki D Michael, Ploof Dianna, Kolarik Russell
Department of Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
Med Educ. 2005 Oct;39(10):1036-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02269.x.
Community-based doctors are increasingly utilised for the clinical education of medical students. Faculty development programmes are frequently provided. However, data about the community faculty-student teaching interaction and the longterm impact of such programmes are limited. This study observes community faculty-student teaching interactions and assesses the use of clinical teaching methods taught during faculty development workshops.
Between March and August 2002, 13 rural, urban and suburban community-based faculty who completed at least 1 faculty development workshop were observed during faculty-student-patient encounters and interviewed. Observer-interviewers utilised a checklist to record teaching styles, methods and skills, and administered a questionnaire to obtain community faculty's self-perceptions.
On observation, the assertive precepting style and didactic teaching predominated in 90% and 86% of teaching encounters, respectively. Interactive discussion and direct observation occurred less often, in 71% and 18% of encounters, respectively. Feedback was provided in 25% of encounters. On interview, community faculty reported that faculty development workshops resulted in improved precepting effectiveness and professional satisfaction with moderate to considerable improvement in feedback, interactive teaching and use of multiple precepting styles for 100%, 77% and 77% of community faculty, respectively. Community faculty reported that their skills in addressing problem students, direct observation and didactic teaching improved moderately. There was little statistical correlation between self-assessed and observed skills.
Community-based faculty rate their teaching skills as improved following faculty development. Observation reveals that interactive discussion, direct observation, feedback and problem management skills are still lacking.
社区医生越来越多地被用于医学生的临床教育。经常会提供教师发展项目。然而,关于社区教师与学生教学互动以及此类项目长期影响的数据有限。本研究观察社区教师与学生的教学互动,并评估教师发展工作坊中所教授临床教学方法的使用情况。
2002年3月至8月期间,对13名完成至少一次教师发展工作坊的农村、城市和郊区社区教师在师生与患者接触过程中进行了观察并进行访谈。观察访谈者使用一份清单记录教学风格、方法和技能,并发放问卷以获取社区教师的自我认知。
观察发现,在90%的教学接触中,自信指导风格占主导,86%的教学接触中说教式教学占主导。互动讨论和直接观察分别在71%和18%的接触中较少出现。25%的接触中提供了反馈。访谈中,社区教师报告称教师发展工作坊提高了指导效果和职业满意度,分别有100%、77%和77%的社区教师在反馈、互动教学和多种指导风格的使用方面有中度到显著的改善。社区教师报告称他们处理问题学生、直接观察和说教式教学的技能有适度提高。自我评估技能与观察到的技能之间几乎没有统计学相关性。
社区教师认为他们的教学技能在教师发展后有所提高。观察表明,互动讨论、直接观察、反馈和问题管理技能仍然欠缺。