Suppr超能文献

神经外科中不同预防方案治疗深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞的风险与益处综述。

A review of the risks and benefits of differing prophylaxis regimens for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in neurosurgery.

作者信息

Epstein Nancy E

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

出版信息

Surg Neurol. 2005 Oct;64(4):295-301; discussion 302. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.04.039.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Annually, 2 million people in the United States develop deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and nearly 100,000 sustain fatal pulmonary emboli. Prophylaxis against DVT/pulmonary embolism (PE) is a critical issue, and options include elastic stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression stockings, low-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 U every 8-12 hours), and low molecular-weight heparin (ie, enoxaparin and dalteparin). The risks and benefits associated with different prophylaxis regimens used in the prevention of DVT and PE in neurosurgical procedures were analyzed.

METHODS

Neurosurgical studies focusing on different methods of prophylaxis used for the prevention of DVT and PE were reviewed. The efficacy, risks, and benefits of varied treatment options were evaluated, with particular emphasis on minor and major hemorrhages occurring where heparin-based protocols were used.

RESULTS

In Flinn et al series (Arch Surg. 1996;131(5):472-80), the incidence of DVT was greater for cranial (7.7%) than spinal procedures (1.5%). Although intermittent pneumatic compression devices provided adequate reduction of DVT/PE in some cranial and combined cranial/spinal series, low-dose subcutaneous unfractionated heparin or low molecular-weight heparins further reduced the incidence, not always of DVT, but of PE (Br J Neurosurg 1995;9(2):159-63; J Intensive Care Med 2003;18(2):59-79). Nevertheless, low-dose heparin-based prophylaxis in cranial and spinal series risks minor and major postoperative hemorrhages: 2% to 4% in a cranial series, 3.4% minor and 3.4% major hemorrhages in a combined cranial/spinal series, and a 0.7% incidence of major/minor hemorrhages in a spinal series (J Neurosurg 2003;99(4):680-4; Neurosurgery 1986;18(4):440-5; Eur Spine J 2004;13(1):1-8; J Intensive Care Med 2003;18(2):59-79).

CONCLUSIONS

Although mechanical prophylaxis provided effective prophylaxis against DVT/PE in many series, the added efficacy of low-dose heparin regimens has to be weighed against risks of major postoperative hemorrhages and their neurological sequelae.

摘要

背景

在美国,每年有200万人发生深静脉血栓形成(DVT),近10万人死于致命性肺栓塞。预防DVT/肺栓塞(PE)是一个关键问题,预防措施包括使用弹力袜、间歇性气动压迫袜、低剂量普通肝素(每8 - 12小时5000单位)和低分子量肝素(即依诺肝素和达肝素)。分析了神经外科手术中用于预防DVT和PE的不同预防方案的风险和益处。

方法

回顾了聚焦于预防DVT和PE的不同预防方法的神经外科研究。评估了各种治疗方案的疗效、风险和益处,特别关注使用基于肝素方案时发生的小出血和大出血情况。

结果

在弗林等人的系列研究(《外科学文献》。1996年;131(5):472 - 480)中,颅骨手术的DVT发生率(7.7%)高于脊柱手术(1.5%)。尽管在一些颅骨及颅骨/脊柱联合手术系列中,间歇性气动压迫装置能充分降低DVT/PE的发生率,但低剂量皮下普通肝素或低分子量肝素进一步降低了发生率,并非总是降低DVT的发生率,而是降低PE的发生率(《英国神经外科学杂志》1995年;9(2):159 - 163;《重症监护医学杂志》2003年;18(2):59 - 79)。然而,在颅骨和脊柱手术系列中,基于低剂量肝素的预防措施存在术后小出血和大出血的风险:颅骨手术系列中为2%至4%,颅骨/脊柱联合手术系列中小出血发生率为3.4%,大出血发生率为3.4%,脊柱手术系列中大小出血发生率为0.7%(《神经外科学杂志》2003年;99(4):680 - 684;《神经外科学》1986年;18(4):440 - 445;《欧洲脊柱杂志》2004年;13(1):1 - 8;《重症监护医学杂志》2003年;18(2):59 - 79)。

结论

尽管在许多系列研究中,机械预防措施能有效预防DVT/PE,但低剂量肝素方案增加的疗效必须与术后大出血风险及其神经后遗症相权衡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验