Mitchell Ana W, Nyland Nora K
Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Oct;105(10):1605-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.07.008.
This study examined learning styles of faculty members and senior students in coordinated programs in dietetics and compared learning styles by area of career expertise (faculty) or interest (students). Respondents included 108 faculty members and 324 students. The survey included a standardized Learning Styles Inventory and questions regarding demographics and career preferences. chi(2) analysis was used to compare learning style with selected variables. Significant differences were found between student and faculty learning styles (P=.006). Faculty also had significant differences in learning styles within various areas of expertise (P=.037), but no significant differences were found in learning style by expected career choice of students. Students listed entry-level and 5-year career choices. Most (55.6%) plan to work in clinical nutrition following graduation, but 37.0% anticipate being in a nontraditional area of dietetics 5 years postgraduation. Only 6.8% plan to work in management at entry, dropping to 3.4% at 5 years.
本研究调查了营养学协调项目中教员和高年级学生的学习风格,并按职业专长领域(教员)或兴趣(学生)对学习风格进行了比较。受访者包括108名教员和324名学生。该调查包括一份标准化的学习风格量表以及有关人口统计学和职业偏好的问题。采用卡方分析将学习风格与选定变量进行比较。结果发现学生和教员的学习风格存在显著差异(P = 0.006)。教员在不同专长领域的学习风格也存在显著差异(P = 0.037),但学生预期的职业选择在学习风格上未发现显著差异。学生列出了入门级和5年职业选择。大多数(55.6%)计划毕业后从事临床营养工作,但37.0%预计毕业后5年从事非传统营养学领域工作。只有6.8%计划入门时从事管理工作,5年后降至3.4%。