Buchanan H
University of Derby, Mickleover, Derby DE3 9GX, UK.
Br Dent J. 2005 Sep 24;199(6):359-62; discussion 351; quiz 372. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812694.
To provide reliability and validity data on a computerised dental anxiety scale (the Smiley Faces Program or SFP) for children using faces as a response set.
Five schools across Derby, Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Shropshire.
The SFP was completed by 464 children (mean age 10.8 years). For validity purposes, 241 children also completed two other children's dental anxiety measures (the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale and the Dental Fear Survey). For test-retest purposes 100 of the children completed the SFP two weeks later.
The SFP demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.8), test-retest reliability was good and significant correlations were found between the SFP and the other measures. The children rated the local anaesthetic and drill as the most anxiety-provoking items.
This study suggests that the SFP is a valid and reliable measure for assessing children's trait dental anxiety and may help encourage dentists to formally assess dental anxiety.
提供关于一种以面部表情作为反应选项的儿童牙科焦虑计算机量表(笑脸程序或SFP)的信效度数据。
德比、泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔和什罗普郡的五所学校。
464名儿童(平均年龄10.8岁)完成了SFP。为了验证效度,241名儿童还完成了另外两种儿童牙科焦虑测量工具(改良儿童牙科焦虑量表和牙科恐惧调查问卷)。为了进行重测,100名儿童在两周后再次完成了SFP。
SFP显示出良好的内部一致性(α = 0.8),重测信度良好,且SFP与其他测量工具之间存在显著相关性。儿童将局部麻醉和牙钻评为最引发焦虑的项目。
本研究表明,SFP是评估儿童特质性牙科焦虑的有效且可靠的测量工具,可能有助于鼓励牙医对牙科焦虑进行正式评估。