Borowitz Michael J, Pullen D Jeanette, Winick Naomi, Martin Paul L, Bowman W Paul, Camitta Bruce
Department of Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA.
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2005 Nov;68(1):18-24. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20071.
Flow cytometric analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) depends on detecting phenotypically abnormal populations. However, little is known about how phenotypic shifts between diagnosis and relapse affect MRD detection in childhood acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL).
We compared diagnostic and relapse bone marrow specimens in 42 children with precursor B-ALL studied with the two-tube panel CD19-APC/CD45-PerCP/CD10-PE/CD20-FITC and CD19-APC/CD45-PerCP/CD9-PE/CD34-FITC.
At least 29 cases had phenotypic shifts of intensity or coefficient of variation of distribution of one or more markers. Shifts were complex and could not be explained by change in maturation stage. In the majority of cases MRD populations more closely resembled the diagnostic than the relapse specimen. In 6 of 7 MRD negative cases we did not identify an abnormal population that resembled diagnosis or relapse. In the remaining case, in which CD34 and CD10 were lost between diagnosis and relapse, it is possible that we could have missed an MRD population resembling relapse.
Phenotypic shifts are common, but do not affect MRD recognition. At most 1 of 42 cases might have harbored an abnormal population undetected because of shift. However, MRD analysis with rigid gating (looking strictly for abnormal phenotypes at diagnosis) might have missed many positive cases, 8 of 22 (36%) in this series.
微小残留病(MRD)的流式细胞术分析依赖于检测表型异常的细胞群。然而,对于儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)诊断与复发之间的表型变化如何影响MRD检测,人们知之甚少。
我们使用双管检测组合CD19-别藻蓝蛋白/CD45-多甲藻叶绿素蛋白/CD10-藻红蛋白/CD20-异硫氰酸荧光素和CD19-别藻蓝蛋白/CD45-多甲藻叶绿素蛋白/CD9-藻红蛋白/CD34-异硫氰酸荧光素,对42例前体B-ALL儿童的诊断和复发骨髓标本进行了比较。
至少29例出现一种或多种标志物强度或分布变异系数的表型变化。这些变化很复杂,无法用成熟阶段的改变来解释。在大多数情况下,MRD细胞群与诊断标本的相似性高于复发标本。在7例MRD阴性病例中的6例中,我们未识别出类似于诊断或复发的异常细胞群。在其余病例中,诊断与复发之间CD34和CD10丢失,我们有可能遗漏了类似于复发的MRD细胞群。
表型变化很常见,但不影响MRD识别。42例中最多有1例可能因表型变化而存在未被检测到的异常细胞群。然而,采用严格设门的MRD分析(严格寻找诊断时的异常表型)可能会遗漏许多阳性病例,本系列中有22例中的8例(36%)。